HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1623
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Technology, Energy & Communications
Title: An act relating to setting fees for utility easements on state-owned aquatic lands.
Brief Description: Concerning fees for easements on state-owned aquatic lands.
Sponsors: Representative Morris.
Brief History:
Technology, Energy & Communications: 1/26/07, 2/16/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY, ENERGY & COMMUNICATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Morris, Chair; McCoy, Vice Chair; Crouse, Ranking Minority Member; McCune, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Eddy, Ericksen, Hankins, Hudgins, Hurst, Takko and VanDeWege.
Staff: Scott Richards (786-7156).
Background:
The Department of Natural Resources (Department) is responsible for managing, for the
benefit of the public, state-owned aquatic lands. Aquatic lands means all tidelands,
shorelands, harbor areas, and the beds of navigable waters.
As the manager of state-owned aquatic lands, the Department must strive to balance the
public benefits for all citizens. Public benefits of aquatic lands include encouraging direct
public use and access, fostering water-dependent uses, ensuring environmental protection,
and utilizing renewable resources.
The Department is vested with the authority to grant the use of state-owned aquatic lands
upon terms and conditions and length of time that are consistent with the state Constitution
and state laws. The Department may withhold from leasing lands which it finds to have
significant natural values, or may provide within any lease for the protection of such values.
Governmental entities may use state-owned aquatic lands for public utility lines as long as the
use is consistent with statutory purposes for these lands and does not obstruct navigation or
other uses. Public utility lines are utility lines owned by a public entity and may or may not
serve citizens of the state.
Non-governmental entities may use state-owned aquatic lands for local public utility lines as
long as the use is consistent with statutory purposes for these lands and does not obstruct
navigation or other uses. Local public utility lines are utility lines owned by a non-governmental entity and provide service to citizens of the state.
For both governmental and non-governmental entities, utility lines include:
Administrative Costs and Easement Fees
In granting use of state aquatic lands to governmental entities, the Department may recover
only its reasonable direct administrative costs incurred in processing and approving the
request or application, and reviewing plans for construction of public utility lines. Direct
administrative costs means the cost of hours worked directly on an application or request,
based on salaries and benefits, plus travel reimbursement and other actual out-of-pocket
costs. Direct administrative costs recovered by the Department must be deposited into the
Resource Management Cost Account.
In granting use of state aquatic lands to non-governmental entities, the Department charges an
easement fee according to the length of the easement:
Easement fees are adjusted annually by the rate of yearly increase in the Consumer Price
Index (all urban consumers Seattle-Everett Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area). The term
of an easement is 30 years.
Currently, the adjusted easement fees are as follows:
In addition to the easement fee, the Department may recover from a non-governmental entity
its direct administrative costs associated with receiving, approving the application and
reviewing plans for, and construction of local public utility lines. Direct administrative costs
means the cost of hours worked directly on an application, based on salaries and benefits,
plus travel reimbursement and other actual out-of-pocket costs. Direct administrative costs
recovered by the Department must be deposited into the Resource Management Cost
Account.
These fee structures for governmental and non-governmental entities will expire on July 1,
2008.
Expedited Processing of Application
Upon request of the applicant, the Department may offer expedited processing of
applications, reaching a decision within 60 days. The Department may charge an additional
fee for expedited processing. The fee for expedited processing is the greater of: (a) 10
percent of the combined total of the easement fee and direct administrative costs; or (b) the
cost of staff overtime, calculated at time and one-half.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Calculating Administrative Costs
Administrative costs incurred processing public utility line easement applications are
calculated as a percentage of the easement fee based on the length of the crossing.
In granting use of state-owned aquatic lands to public utility lines owned by
non-governmental entities, the administrative costs are equivalent to 20 percent of the
easement fee with adjustments based on the most recently published Consumer Price Index.
In granting use of state-owned aquatic lands to public utility lines owned by governmental
entities, the Department recovers only its administrative costs incurred in processing and
approving the request or application. The administrative costs are calculated based on the
easement fee associated with the length of that easement, if governmental entities were
subject to the easement fee.
Termination Date of Easement Fee and Administrative Costs
A termination date of July 1, 2017, is provided for the easement fee structure and the
calculation of administrative costs.
Term of an Easement
The term of an easement may be 30 years or less.
Expedited Applications
The application charge for expedited processing is 10 percent of the combined total of the
easement fee and administrative costs.
Bundling of Applications
When multiple public utility lines are owned by the same entity and are authorized under the
same easement, the administrative fee for the easement shall be equal to 20 percent of the
easement fee for the single longest public utility line.
Legislative Review
The Legislature will review by December 31, 2016, the granting of easements on state-owned
aquatic lands and determine whether all applications for easements are processed in the
appropriate amount of time and whether the granting of easements on state-owned aquatic
lands generates reasonable income for the Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill provides a termination date of July 1, 2017, for which the Department of
Natural Resources may charge for the granting of an easement on state-owned aquatic lands.
Allows governmental and non-governmental entities to bundle multiple public utility lines
under the same easement application and be charged the administration rate of the single
longest easement.
Specifies the Legislature will review by December 31, 2016, the granting of easements on
state-owned aquatic lands and determine whether all applications for easements are processed
in the appropriate amount of time and whether the granting of easements on state-owned
aquatic lands generates reasonable income for the Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account.
Restores the term "local" to public utility lines.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) When the Legislature started to look at this issue there was a very long wait to
get an easement through the Department. Now there is virtually no wait to have an
application processed. The law has worked well. It must be noted that a termination date
about 10 years out will likely be included in this bill before it leaves the committee.
(Opposed) Based on a quick, preliminary estimate, there may be concerns about how the fees
are calculated and how much utilities will be charged for these fees. Our assumptions around
these estimates may need to be corrected once we have more information on how the
Department intends to calculate the fees.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Morris, prime sponsor; and Fran McNair,
Aquatic Lands Steward, Department of Natural Resources.
(Opposed) Marge Bailey, Qwest; Dave Warren, Washington Public Utility District
Assocation; and Wes Gray, Grays Harbor Public Utility District.