HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1650
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Environmental Health, Select
Title: An act relating to providing for an inspected inventory of on-site sewage disposal systems not located within a marine recovery area designated under RCW 70.118A.040.
Brief Description: Providing for an inspected inventory of on-site sewage disposal systems.
Sponsors: Representatives Fromhold, Hunt, B. Sullivan and Moeller.
Brief History:
Select Committee on Environmental Health: 2/7/07, 2/20/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Campbell, Chair; Hudgins, Vice Chair; Sump, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Chase, Hunt, Morrell and Wood.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Newhouse, Ranking Minority Member and Hailey.
Staff: Amy McCormick (786-7290).
Background:
The State Board of Health (Board) provides a forum for the development of public health
policy in Washington. The Board has adopted rules and standards for prevention, control,
and abatement of health hazards and nuisances related to the disposal of wastes, including
on-site sewage disposal systems (OSS). Permits are required for the installation, alteration,
extension, or relocation of an OSS. Local boards of health issue OSS permits, enforce the
standards, and may adopt more stringent local standards.
In October 2000, the Department of Health (DOH) convened the On-Site Wastewater
Advisory Committee to advise the DOH on policy matters relating to the Wastewater
Management Program. A rule development committee was formed in February 2002, to
assist the DOH to initiate the OSS rule revision process, and final rules were adopted in July
2005, for OSSs. These rules required the local health jurisdictions to write plans for the
development and management of all OSSs within their jurisdictions.
In March 2006, legislation passed relating to the management of OSSs in marine recovery
areas. Marine recovery areas must be identified when existing OSSs are a significant factor
contributing to concerns associated with: (1) the degradation of shellfish growing areas; (2)
marine waters listed by the Department of Ecology for low-dissolved oxygen levels or fecal
coliform; or (3) marine waters where nitrogen has been identified as a contaminant of
concern. Local health jurisdictions must develop an on-site strategy to manage OSSs within
marine recovery areas by July 1, 2007 to find failing OSSs. The on-site strategy must address
how the jurisdiction will: (1) find failing systems and ensure that system owners make
repairs by July 1, 2012; and (2) find unknown systems and ensure that they are inspected or
repaired by July 1, 2012.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
A city or town, with a population of 31,000 residents or more, not located within a marine
recovery area, must: (1) create and maintain an inventory of households and businesses that
do not receive sanitary sewage services by January 1, 2009; and (2) institute a program to
inspect all OSSs within the city's or town's jurisdiction by January 1, 2012. Cities and towns
may design and implement the inspection and inventory programs directly or by contract with
a local health jurisdiction.
Inventory
The inventory of households and businesses that do not receive sanitary sewage services may
be designed in any manner that best satisfies the needs of the community as long as the
following minimum criteria are met:
Inspection
The inspection program of OSSs may be designed in any manner that best satisfies the needs
of the community as long as the following minimum criteria are met:
Reimbursement Account
The local On-Site Sewer Inspection Reimbursement Account (Account) is created in the
custody of the State Treasurer. The DOH may use moneys in the Account to reimburse cities
or towns for the costs associated with the creation and maintenance of OSS inventories. If
the Account has available moneys, upon application, cities or towns may be reimbursed for
not less than 75 percent of the reasonable and auditable costs incurred by satisfying the
inventory requirements.
Reporting Requirements
By January 15, 2009, the DOH shall report to the Legislature a summary of the information
provided by cities, towns, and counties regarding the inventory and inspection of OSSs. The
report must include:
The report must be updated no less than three times, and no later than January 15, 2011,
January 15, 2013, and January 15, 2015.
Non-compliance
No permits may be issued for the installation of a new OSS within the boundaries of a city or
town if that city or town is not in compliance with the inventory and inspection program
requirements.
Waiver from Specific Requirements
A requirement to a local health officer's authority to grant a waiver from specific
requirements adopted by the State Board of Health for OSSs is added to include a city's or
town's compliance with the inventory and inspection requirements.
Administrative Search Warrants
A request for an administrative search warrant, if a person has refused a local jurisdiction
access to property, must show, until December 21, 2013, that inspection, examination, test or
sampling is part of a standard inspection program.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
Only cities and towns with a population of 31,000 residents or greater, not in a marine
recovery area, are required to create an inventory and inspection system of OSSs. Creation of
the inventory and inspection system may be created by cities or by contract with a local
health jurisdiction. An inspection system must be created by January 1, 2012, instead of
January 1, 2009. Cities and local health jurisdictions must summarize data on the programs
for the DOH. The local reimbursement Account does not expire in 2015. Permits by
counties or local health jurisdictions for new installations of on-site septic systems within the
city's boundaries are prohibited if a city is not in compliance. Issuing administrative search
warrants as part of an inspection program will not be allowed after December 31, 2013. The
section will be null and void if funding is not provided by June 30, 2007.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The state is incurring high costs for the cleanup of pollution, which is partly
attributed to failing septic systems. Failing systems have a range of health and ecological
impacts, and there is a need for broad education on owning and maintaining septic systems.
Jurisdictions do not know where septic systems exist. This bill would take a basic step of
identifying the systems and requiring inspections. Smaller communities should not be
penalized and have time to set up inspection and inventory programs. It is important to
understand the size of the problem of failing septic systems and to get the systems inspected.
Septic tanks in marine recovery areas are already covered by legislation, and we should not
conflict with that legislation.
(With concerns) Concepts or goals of the bill are good or supported, but there are problems or
concerns with the bill. The impact of septic systems on the environment can be important.
Homeowners should be aware of their septic systems and make sure they are properly
maintained. Inventory and inspection of septic systems are an important assurance of
maintenance. The fiscal impact of the bill could be high for agencies and local government.
Fiscal impacts and short time frames for compliance are a concern. A local jurisdiction not
in compliance would hold up permits for new installations of septic systems, which would
punish someone trying to get a new permit who had nothing to do with the inventory and
inspection process. Cities have never identified or inspected septic systems, as counties or
local health jurisdictions are usually relied upon. Covering only 75 percent of the costs will
be difficult for local jurisdictions. The provision of funds out of the reimbursement Account
is not linked with any responsibilities.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Bruce Wishart, People for Puget Sound.
(With concerns) Melodie Selby, Department of Ecology; Maryanne Guishard, Department of
Health; Jennifer Kunkel, Building Industry and Association of Washington; Dave Williams,
Association of Washington Cities; and Art Starry, Thurston County Environmental Health
Directors.