HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2241
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Technology, Energy & Communications
Title: An act relating to developing more effective streamlining of technology and innovation in the state of Washington.
Brief Description: Developing more effective streamlining of technology and innovation in the state of Washington.
Sponsors: Representatives Hudgins and Wood.
Brief History:
Technology, Energy & Communications: 2/21/07, 2/27/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY, ENERGY & COMMUNICATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 10 members: Representatives Morris, Chair; McCoy, Vice Chair; Crouse, Ranking Minority Member; McCune, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Eddy, Hankins, Hudgins, Hurst, Takko and VanDeWege.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 1 member: Representative Ericksen.
Staff: Scott Richards (786-7156).
Background:
Life Sciences Discovery Fund Authority (Authority)
In 2005, the Legislature established the Authority with the purpose to promote life sciences
research to foster a preventive and predictive vision of the next generation of health-related
innovations, to enhance the competitive position of Washington in this vital sector of the
economy, and to improve the quality and delivery of health care for the people of
Washington. It is expected that this purpose will be achieved by making grants to research
institutions in the state.
Beginning in 2008, Washington's receipts from the tobacco settlement will increase by $35
million per year. The legislation establishing the Authority funnels these monies into a trust
account and authorizes the Authority's trustees to expend it. The intent is to use the money to
help Washington research institutions advance both their competitiveness for external grant
support and their ability to move discoveries toward commercialization.
Spokane Intercollegiate Research and Technology Institute (SIRTI)
The SIRTI performs and commercializes research that will benefit the economic vitality of
Eastern Washington and strengthen university/industry relationships. Also, SIRTI works to
accelerate the development and growth of technology companies regionally in the inland
Northwest. The SIRTI provides commercialization services that help entrepreneurs and start-up technology companies bring their innovations to market, attract investment, and pursue
growth strategies.
Washington Technology Center (WTC)
The Legislature established the WTC in 1983 with the purpose to promote collaborative
efforts between the state's universities, private industry, and government. It does so by
performing and commercializing research on a statewide basis that benefits the intermediate
and long-term economic vitality of Washington, and to develop and strengthen
university/industry relationships through the conduct of research that is primarily of interest
to Washington-based companies or state economic development programs.
Streamlining Technology and Energy Project
During the 2006 interim, the Technology, Energy and Communications (TEC) Committee
conducted research and surveyed state-based technology and energy entities to answer some
fundamental questions about how these entities perform their statutory mission, set policies
and priorities, fund operations and measure performance. The TEC Committee undertook
this project with the goal to provide more focus and efficient use of resources by centralizing
missions and reducing administrative overhead of relevant entities. The Authority, SIRTI
and WTC were surveyed as part of this project.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Annually, the Governor shall report on the vision for technology development in Washington.
The Governor's vision on technology development in Washington must include:
In preparation for the vision for technology development in Washington, the Governor shall
consult with state technology entities to gather input into the Governor's vision for
technology development in Washington.
"State technology entities" means:
The boards of state technology entities shall meet at least once a year with an awareness of
the state budget timetable to discuss and coordinate: (1) activities related to the
implementation of the work plan to carry out the Governor's statewide technology strategy
and (2) matters related to technology research, technology transfer, and technology
commercialization. The boards of the state technology entities shall jointly hold at least one
meeting in conjunction with a state technology entity board of directors or trustees meeting to
maximize efficient use of organizational resources.
State technology entities shall develop an annual work plan to:
Joint State Technology Entity Budget Request
By November 30, 2007, the Office of Financial Management (OFM) shall develop and
provide to the Legislature:
By August 1, 2008, the executive directors of the state technology entities shall develop jointly a budget for the Governor to consider and recommend to the Legislature. The joint budget shall take into consideration recommendations made by the OFM.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The original bill provided an intent section only.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Last interim, the TEC Committee looked at various state technology entities to
make sure that their efforts are complementary and not competitive. There are things state
technology entities can collaborate on such as support services and a similar overhead rate.
The ultimate goal of the bill is to make government run more efficiency and make sure
entities are working together.
(With concerns) There needs to be clarification in the bill about what the final outcome
should be. There are some terms used in the bill that are not clear. There is significant
collaboration going on currently. We are in favor of the state working more efficiently.
There are no performance measures that are clear in the bill.
(Information only) The Washington Technology Center (WTC) is in agreement with the
goals of the bill such as operating more efficiently, committing to performance measures that
demonstrate in real terms the benefits to the public, and collaborating across the state with
partners. The Economic Development Commission developed a report that provided that
there is no need for a coordinating board for WTC and SIRTI and others. Also, coordination
is occurring currently.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Hudgins, prime sponsor.
(With concerns) Kim Zentz, Spokane Intercollegiate Research and Technology Institute.
(Information only) Bill Stauffacher, Washington Technology Center; and Bill Grinstein,
Washington Economic Development Commission.