HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2262
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Education
Title: An act relating to salary bonuses for individuals certified by the national board for professional teaching standards.
Brief Description: Providing salary bonuses for individuals certified by the national board for professional teaching standards.
Sponsors: Representatives Barlow, McCoy, Hunter, Seaquist, Eddy, Fromhold, Ormsby, Sells and Morrell.
Brief History:
Education: 2/26/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Quall, Chair; Barlow, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haigh, McDermott, Roach and P. Sullivan.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 1 member: Representative Santos.
Staff: Barbara McLain (786-7383).
Background:
The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) is a national, nonprofit
organization that has developed standards for highly accomplished teaching and a voluntary
system to certify teachers who meet those standards. There are also NBPTS certificates for
librarians and school counselors. In Washington, instructional staff can use NBPTS
certification in lieu of a professional certificate. Funding is provided through federal and
private sources to assist candidates with the application fee. Since 1999, state funding has
been provided through the appropriations act for a bonus for NBPTS-certified staff. The
2005-07 biennial budget provides an annual bonus of $3,500. The bonus program has not
been created in statute. As of January 2007, there were 1,310 NBPTS-certified instructional
staff in Washington.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Instructional staff with NBPTS certification receive a bonus for each year they maintain the
certification. The amount of the bonus is $5,250 for Fiscal Year 2008 and $5,400 for Fiscal
Year 2009. Thereafter, the amount is established in the operating budget, except the amount
may be prorated if more than 5 percent of the eligible instructional staff in the state receive
certification and the resulting cost of providing bonuses exceeds the legislative appropriation
for them.
The NBPTS-certified staff who meet certain criteria are eligible for additional bonuses:
(1) Individuals in an instructional assignment in a school where at least 70 percent of the
students qualify for federal free and reduced lunch receive an additional $5,000 bonus.
(2) Individuals with NBPTS certification in middle level or high school mathematics or
science who are in a math or science instructional assignment in a school where at least
70 percent of the students qualify for federal free and reduced lunch receive an additional
$10,000 bonus.
Bonuses are in addition to other compensation and not included in state salary limitations for
certificated instructional staff.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
Rather than a $5,000 annual bonus, all NBPTS-certified teachers receive $5,250 for fiscal
year 2008 and $5,400 for fiscal year 2009. Thereafter, the bonus amount is established in the
operating budget.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 24, 2007.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) It is appropriate to reward teachers who go the extra mile to get certified.
Districts and students benefit from the extra knowledge and skills these teachers bring to the
classroom. Teachers should be encouraged to seek this level of skill.
(With concerns) The larger need is to fully fund K-12 education. This is a good idea, but we
need to focus on the bigger picture. It would have been better to base the bonus on 10
percent of salary. There is much stronger support for that approach. There should not be a
limitation or cap on the number or percent of teachers who could receive the full bonus.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Barlow, prime sponsor.
(With concerns) Mitch Denning, Alliance of Education Association; Lucinda Young,
Washington Education Association; and Kyra Kester, Office of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction.