HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESHB 2292
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
March 10, 2007
Title: An act relating to private residential fire sprinklers.
Brief Description: Addressing private residential fire sprinklers.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Simpson and Ormsby).
Brief History:
Local Government: 2/26/07 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/10/07, 96-1.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Simpson, Chair; Eddy, Vice Chair; Curtis, Ranking Minority Member; B. Sullivan and Takko.
Minority Report: Without reccommendation. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Schindler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member and Ross.
Staff: Jessica Nowakowski (786-7291) and Ethan Moreno (786-7386).
Background:
State Building Code Council
The State Building Code Council (Council) was created by statute in 1974 to provide analysis
and advice to the Legislature and the Governor's Office on state building code issues. The
Council establishes the minimum building, mechanical, fire, plumbing, and energy code
requirements in Washington by reviewing, developing, and adopting the state building code.
The State Building Code Act (Act) sets forth requirements through the provision of building
codes to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants or users of buildings and
structures throughout the state
The Act consists of regulations adopted by reference from the International Building Code
(IBC), the International Residential Code (IRC), the International Mechanical Code (IMC),
the National Fuel Gas Code, the International Fire Code (IFC), and the Uniform Plumbing
Code and Uniform Plumbing Code Standards. In maintaining the Act, the Council must
regularly review updated versions of the codes and other pertinent information and amend the
Act as deemed appropriate by the Council. The Council may also issue opinions relating to
the codes at the request of a local official charged with the duty to enforce the Act.
Private Residential Fire Sprinkler Charges
Fire sprinklers are required in certain sections of the IBC, IRC, IFC, and by the National Fire
Protection Agency (NFPA). Sprinkler requirements of the IBC are typically applied to larger
residential occupancies such as hotels, apartments, dormitories or condominiums. Single
family dwellings (as defined by the IRC) in Washington are not required to install sprinklers
for fire protection, unless local municipalities have adopted additional requirements of the
IRC into their local building code requirements.
Water purveyors throughout the state may work with the State Board of Health to establish
"standby fees" or a fee structure based on the required amount of water necessary to supply
residential sprinklers with adequate water to fight a fire. Municipalities and water purveyors
may determine their own standby fees or fee structures for costs incurred in providing the
necessary water levels.
Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill:
The State Building Code Council is required to form a technical advisory group to research
and review policies and procedures for residential fire sprinklers. The purpose of the study is
to research obstacles and barriers to the installation of residential fire sprinkler systems.
The technical advisory group must consist of:
Findings of the technical advisory group must be presented to the appropriate committees of the Legislature by the State Building Code Council by January 15, 2008.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Due to local code requirements and lack of water flow access, fire sprinklers are
being required. This bill addresses concerns brought up by a previous bill. The study will
attempt to solve an unsolvable problem. Most concerns are technical in nature.
(With concerns) The language of the bill is very broad and could therefore cause unintended
consequences. Language to clarify the intention of the bill would be helpful.
(Opposed) Creating residential fire sprinkler policies changes the objectivity of a study. This
bill could have many unintended consequences, such as liability, inconsistency of practices to
conserve water, and a shift in costs if a code were imposed that did not consider all factors
that effect rate purveyors in a district.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Paul O'Connor, Fire Sprinkler Advisory Board of Puget
Sound; and Joe Daniels, Washington Association of Sewer/Water Districts.
(With concerns) Brian Minnich, Building Industry Association of Washington; and Bill
Clarke, Washington Public Utility District Association.
(Opposed) Steve Lindstrom, Sno-King Water District Coalition.