HOUSE BILL REPORT
2SHB 2514
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Amended by the Senate
Title: An act relating to protecting southern resident orca whales from disturbances by vessels.
Brief Description: Protecting orca whales from the impacts from vessels.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Apps Subcom GG (originally sponsored by Representatives Quall, Appleton, McCoy, Morris, McIntire, Nelson, Kagi and Upthegrove).
Brief History:
Agriculture & Natural Resources: 1/17/08, 1/24/08 [DPS];
Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government & Audit Review: 2/5/08, 2/7/08[DP2S(w/o sub AGNR)].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/15/08, 67-27.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 3/6/08, 41-7.
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Blake, Chair; Van De Wege, Vice Chair; Grant, Lantz, Loomis, McCoy and Nelson.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Kretz, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Newhouse and Orcutt.
Staff: Jaclyn Ford (786-7339).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT & AUDIT REVIEW
Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources. Signed by 10 members: Representatives Linville, Chair; Ericks, Vice Chair; Armstrong, Ranking Minority Member; Blake, Lantz, Liias, Miloscia, Morris, Nelson and Van De Wege.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Skinner, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Chandler and Kretz.
Staff: Alicia Dunkin (786-7178).
Background:
The Orca (Orcinus orca)
The Orca is the official marine mammal of Washington.
The federal government listed a population of Orcas, known as the Southern Residents, as
"endangered" under the Endangered Species Act in December 2005. These Orcas spend each
summer and fall in Washington's Puget Sound. The population is composed of three family
groups of whales that have been named J, K, and L pods.
Some of the possible causes of the Southern Resident's decline are: reduced quantity and
quality of prey; persistent pollutants that cause immune or reproductive system dysfunction;
oil spills; and noise and disturbance from vessels. Federal rule implementation is estimated
to occur by late 2009.
In the summer of 2007, San Juan County passed a local ordinance to protect the endangered
Southern Resident Orca whale population from boaters. The San Juan County ordinance is
based on the "Be Whale Wise" guidelines developed by the Whale Watch Operators
Association Northwest and the Whale Museum Sound Watch Boater Education Program.
County marine enforcement can issue citations for those boaters harassing the whales within
San Juan County waters.
Boating Safety Laws
Washington's boating safety laws are administered by the Washington State Parks and
Recreation Commission (State Parks). Every law enforcement officer in Washington and its
political subdivisions has the authority to enforce the boating laws, including county sheriffs,
officers of other local law enforcement entities, the Washington State Patrol, state park
rangers, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW).
Natural Resource Infractions
A natural resource infraction is a monetary penalty of no more than $500 for each offense,
unless specifically authorized by statute. Natural resource infractions are non-criminal
offenses.
Summary of Second Substitute Bill:
It is a natural resource infraction to approach or cause a vessel to approach a southern Orca
whale within 300 feet. It is also a natural resource infraction to intercept, feed, or fail to
disengage the transmission of a vessel within 300 feet of a southern Orca whale.
A person is exempt from these requirements if the safety of the vessel or its crew or
passengers is in jeopardy, or because of vessel design limitations, or weather conditions make
complying infeasible. Also exempt are commercial fishers actively tending to their gear,
officials on duty, and people authorized by a state or federal agency.
The WDFW and the State Parks will disseminate information about the new regulations
regarding southern Orca whales, current whale and wildlife viewing guidelines, and other
responsible wildlife viewing messages.
Washington law enforcement is encouraged to utilize all existing statutes and regulations,
including the boating safety laws, to protect southern Orca whales from impacts of vessels.
EFFECT OF SENATE AMENDMENT(S):
The Senate amendment specifies that the vessel safety exemption contained in the bill applies
from the perspective of a "reasonably prudent person."
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Agriculture & Natural Resources)
(In support) Orcas are enjoyed by citizens in this state as well as the rest of the country.
Washington needs to protect the Orcas. Washington is lucky to have these magical creatures.
Interim measures must be taken to protect the Orca while waiting for the federal rules to be
implemented. There is a negative impact on the health of the Orcas from harassing boats.
Boating harassment issues are real. Current state and federal law is inadequate to protect the
Orcas. The WDFW should be given rule-making authority, in order to make the current bill
the minimum standard and to help define "knowingly." "Knowingly" is difficult to enforce,
and the WDFW should have the tools to make this more enforceable.
(With concerns) Ocean-going vessels should not have to comply with the regulations in this
bill. Large boats do not have the same effect on Orcas as smaller vessels do.
(Opposed) None.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Appropriations Subcommittee on General
Government & Audit Review)
(In support) There are 30 to 40 marine patrols to decrease harassment by boaters to orcas, and
this bill addresses the harassment issues that are real. The current guidelines and state
regulations are not adequate and neither is the outreach and education material. This bill
brings us closer to being able to provide local and state enforcement tools, as work on the
federal level may take years to implement any action. We are concerned that by adding the
word "knowingly" to the bill when people approach orcas that it would be difficult to enforce.
How would people know a southern orca from any other type? There is language in the
underlying bill that states that if one is approached by a whale and not able to get out of their
path then this interaction is exempt from enforcement. This bill was modeled after the San
Juan county ordinance.
(Opposed) If there is an oil tanker or container ship, we do not want them to go into neutral
or swerve as this will become a safety issue. State statutes should be clear. There also may
be a Federal maritime law issue with this bill because states are not generally permitted to
regulate commercial vessels.
Persons Testifying: (Agriculture & Natural Resources) (In support) Representative
Appleton, prime sponsor; Chuck Williams, King County; Kevin Ranker, San Juan County;
Mike Cenci, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Bruce Wishart, People for Puget
Sound; Paul Pearce, Scamania County; Kari Koski, Soundwatch; and David Dicks, Puget
Sound Partnership.
(With concerns) Randy Roy, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government & Audit
Review) (In support) Mike Cenci, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; and Bruce
Wishart, People for Puget Sound.
(Opposed) Randy Ray, Pacific Marine Science Association.