HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 2560
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
February 14, 2008
Title: An act relating to defining small employers for purposes of health insurance coverage.
Brief Description: Defining small employers for purposes of health insurance coverage.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Health Care & Wellness (originally sponsored by Representatives VanDeWege, Kessler, Cody, Morrell, Rolfes, Chase, Barlow, Green and Loomis).
Brief History:
Health Care & Wellness: 1/17/08, 1/24/08 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/14/08, 95-0.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH CARE & WELLNESS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 12 members: Representatives Cody, Chair; Morrell, Vice Chair; Hinkle, Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Barlow, Campbell, Condotta, Green, Moeller, Pedersen, Schual-Berke and Seaquist.
Staff: Dave Knutson (786-7146).
Background:
Washington law has a more restrictive definition of "small employer" or "small group" than
does federal law. The federal definition at 42 U.S.C. s300gg-91(e)(4) is "...in connection
with a group health plan, with respect to a calendar year and a plan year, an employer who
employed an average of at least 2 but not more than 50 employees on business days during
the preceding calendar year and who employs at least 2 employees on the first day of the plan
year."
The state definition of a "small employer" or "small group" is more narrow than the federal
definition, adding several requirements. These additional requirements include:
Conflicting federal and state definitions of "small employer" and "small group" may lead to confusion on the part of small employers, health carriers, and the Office of the Insurance Commissioner who may purchase health coverage through the small group insurance market.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The definitions of "small employer" and "small group" are modified to eliminate an income
test for small businesses in order for them to qualify for small group health coverage. The
definition of "employee" of a small employer is modified to be consistent with the federal
definition found in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 that was in effect
on January 1, 2008.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The state definitions of "small employer," "small group," and "employee" are
more restrictive than the same definitions found in federal law. This causes confusion on the
part of health carriers, employers, and employees when an employer tries to purchase health
coverage for their employees. Making the state definitions consistent with federal law will
make it easier for small employers to purchase health coverage for their employers in the
private market.
(With concerns) The definition of "employee" is important to have in state law so carriers
will be able to determine the minimum participation rate when providing health coverage to
small employers. If the federal definition of "employee" is included in the bill, it would
address this concern.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Van De Wege, prime sponsor; and Todd
Holm.
(With concerns) Gary Smith, Independent Business Association; and Naucee Wildermuth,
Regence Blue Shield.