HOUSE BILL REPORT
E2SHB 2647
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
February 18, 2008
Title: An act relating to the children's safe products act.
Brief Description: Regarding the children's safe products act.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Dickerson, Hudgins, Hunt, Morrell, Pedersen, Williams, Cody, Green, Campbell, VanDeWege, Hasegawa, Roberts, Loomis, Upthegrove, Liias, Hunter, Chase, Smith, McIntire, Barlow, Conway, Priest, Schual-Berke, Simpson, Kenney, Goodman, Sells, Rolfes, Darneille and Lantz).
Brief History:
Select Committee on Environmental Health: 1/23/08, 1/30/08 [DPS];
Appropriations: 2/6/08, 2/8/08 [DP2S(w/o sub ENVH)].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/18/08, 95-0.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Second Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Campbell, Chair; Hudgins, Vice Chair; Sump, Ranking Minority Member; Chase, Hunt, Morrell, Newhouse and Wood.
Staff: Ashley Pedersen (786-7303).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on Select Committee on Environmental Health. Signed by 19 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Green, Haigh, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Linville, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Schual-Berke, Seaquist and Sullivan.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 10 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Chandler, Hinkle, Kretz, Priest, Ross, Schmick and Walsh.
Staff: Alicia Dunkin (786-7178).
Background:
Federal Laws, Regulations, and Guidelines
The Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA) grants the Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC) the authority to promulgate regulations to protect consumers from
products containing hazardous substances. The CPSC has restricted the amount of lead in
paint to a maximum of 600 parts per million (ppm). This restriction applies to consumer
products (defined in section 3(a)(1) of the Consumer Product Safety Act), toys, furniture, and
products sold to consumers for use in homes, schools, parks, hospitals, and other areas. The
CPSC is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of serious injury or death
from more than 15,000 types of consumer products under the agency's jurisdiction. A part of
CPSC's mission is to inform the public about product hazards and to issue notices of public
recalls. The CPSC issues recalls for toys.
Cosmetics marketed in the United States are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and the Fair
Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA). The FDCA prohibits the marketing of adulterated or
misbranded cosmetics in interstate commerce. Violations of the FDCA involving product
composition – whether they result from ingredients, contaminants, processing, packaging, or
shipping and handling – cause cosmetics to be adulterated and subject to regulatory action.
In addition, under the authority of the FPLA, the FDA requires an ingredient declaration on
the cosmetic products sold at the retail level to consumers.
Lead
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's International Chemical Safety
Card for lead, lead can be absorbed into the body by inhalation and ingestion. Long term or
repeated exposure to lead may have effects on the blood bone marrow central nervous
system, peripheral nervous system, kidneys, resulting in anemia, encephalopathy (e.g.,
convulsions), peripheral nerve disease, abdominal cramps and kidney impairment. Long term
or repeated exposure to lead may cause toxicity to human reproduction or development.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a level of 40 ppm of lead as the maximum
that should be allowed in children's products. Lead is often found in brightly colored wood
and vinyl toys, and imported jewelry.
Cadmium
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's International Chemical Safety
Card for cadmium, cadmium can be absorbed into the body by inhalation of its aerosol and by
ingestion. Cadmium exposure is associated in animal studies with developmental effects,
including possible decreases in birth weight, delayed sensory-motor development, hormonal
effects, and altered behavior. Cadmium can cause adverse effects on the kidney, lung and
intestines. Cadmium is classified as a known human carcinogen, associated with lung, and
prostate cancer. Exposure to cadmium can result in bone loss and increased blood pressure.
Acute toxicity from ingestion of high levels of cadmium can result in abdominal pain,
nausea, vomiting, and death.
There are no restrictions on cadmium in children's products in the United States. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency has set a limit of five parts of cadmium per billion parts of
drinking water (5 ppb). The FDA limits the amount of cadmium in food colors to 15 ppm.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration limits workplace air to 100 micrograms
cadmium per cubic meter (100µg/m3) as cadmium fumes and 200 mg/m3 as cadmium dust.
Phthalates
Phthalates are a group of chemicals used in hundreds of products, such as toys, vinyl flooring
and wall coverings, detergents, lubricating oils, food packaging, pharmaceuticals, blood bags
and tubing, and personal care products such as nail polish, hair sprays, soaps, and shampoos.
Phthalates are plasticizers that are added to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) products to impart
flexibility and durability.
Phthalates are widely detected in human blood and urine samples. According to the Centers
for Disease Control, phthalates are found in Americans of all ages, sizes, and races. A 2005
study from the Centers for Disease Control indicates that women are slightly more exposed
than men, and younger children (ages 6-11) are more exposed than older children (ages 12-19
or 20).
Phthalates are animal carcinogens and can cause fetal death, malformations, and reproductive
toxicity in laboratory animals. Nondietary ingestion of phthalates can occur when children
mouth, suck, or chew on phthalate-containing toys or other objects.
Summary of Engrossed Second Substitute Bill:
Beginning July 1, 2009, manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers are prohibited from
manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, distributing for sale, or distributing for use, a
children's product or product component that contain:
Department of Ecology
The Department of Ecology (DOE) must:
High priority chemicals that are of high concern for children are determined based on a
consideration of a child's or developing fetus's potential for exposure to each chemical. The
list must include chemicals that have been found to be in human umbilical cord blood, human
breast milk, human urine, or other bodily tissues or fluids, or to be present in household dust,
indoor air, drinking water, or elsewhere in the home environment. This list must also include
chemicals that have been added to or present in consumer products used or present in the
home.
The DOE's report to the Legislature must include policy options regarding addressing
children's products that contain chemicals of high concern. The report must also include
recommendations for additional ways to inform consumers about toxic chemicals in products.
The DOE may adopt rules implementing, administering, and enforcing this bill.
Manufacturers
Beginning six months after a chemical has been identified as a chemical of high concern,
manufacturers must notify the DOE of its products that contain a high priority chemical. This
notice must be filed annually and must include:
The DOE may require manufacturers to electronically file their annual notice.
No less than 90 days prior to the effective date of the restrictions, manufacturers must notify
persons that sell its products about the provisions of this chapter. Manufacturers must recall
products and reimburse retailers and purchasers for products sold in prohibition of this
chapter.
Manufactures in violation of this chapter may be subject to a civil penalty of up to $5,000 per
violation, and of to $10,000 for each repeat offense.
Retailers
Retailers that unknowingly sell prohibited products are not liable under this chapter.
Secretary of Health
The Secretary of Health is authorized to establish a product safety education campaign to
promote greater awareness of infants and children products that contain chemicals of high
concern for children.
A null and void clause was added.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available. New fiscal note requested on February 5, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Select Committee on Environmental Health)
(In support) Toxic exposures during the first three years of life are critical and can have
devastating effects on a child's development. Early intervention and prevention measures
need to be taken. This bill is timely because during the past six months millions of toys were
recalled because of toxic chemicals in the toys. Consumers have a right to know what
chemicals are in the products they buy. This state has lead the way on these sorts of issues
and should stay out in front. Lead, cadmium, and phthalates are all harmful toxins to
children. For example, lead has devastating effects on the developing brain, cadmium is
classified as a known human carcinogen, and phthalates can cause deformity in the male
reproductive system such as hypospadias, a birth defect of the urethra. There may be
epigenetic effects from exposure to toxins (where genetic impacts are carried on to future
generations). Manufacturers are able to make toys and other children's items such as bottle
nipples without lead, cadmium, and phthalates. Retailers only have the word of the
manufacturers when buying children's products. Manufacturers need to be held accountable.
This will give retailers the means to make educated choices. This bill is in line with the
European Unions' regulations regarding levels of lead and cadimum, and allows for trace
levels of the chemicals in the toys. The 40 ppm level is a middle road requirement when
considering the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's lead levels for other materials such
as lead. Children are exposed to hundreds, if not thousands, of chemicals every day and we
do not know how all of these chemicals interact together. However, phthalates interact
together in an addictive way. Diisononyl phthalate (DINP) is not the only phthalate used in
toys. There are safer alternatives to phthalates. We need to act quickly to protect our
children's health. A chemical action plan takes a year and half, which is too long.
(With concerns) A definition of importer needs to be included because otherwise many
people may be unintentionally included in the bill. Age-ranges should be better defined
because there are some toys, such as chemistry project and magnets, that may still be
appropriate for older children. Testing requirements should be practical and realistic for
manufacturers and producers so that it is achievable for all sizes of businesses.
(Neutral) The DOE is neutral because of the fiscal impacts of this bill, but thinks that the bill
addresses an important topic. Ecology's Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic program
addresses chemicals one at a time. Chemical actions plans are effective but they take a year
to a year and a half each to complete. The dilemma is how to get ahead of the problem and
not just be reactive. This bill brings forward strategic avenues for developing a systemic
approach to dealing with the problem. The bill focuses on children who are the most
vulnerable to toxic chemicals. However, we do have concerns with some of the language of
the bill and will share that to the sponsors.
(Opposed) Phthalates are not linked with lead and cadmium. Phthalates are used only to
plastize vinyl in toys and are a wide studied class of compounds. There is not as much data
about alternate chemicals that could be used in place of phthalates. Phthalates are a class of
chemicals and there are many different types of phthalates. Each different phthalate has very
different characteristics. It takes high dose levels of phthalates to be toxic. We must look at
levels of actual exposure compared to the levels that cause adverse effects. Phthatlates are
found at low levels in the body and they are quickly cleared from the body. Anything can be
toxic; the dose determines the toxicity. The Consumer Product Safety Commission looked
specifically at DINP in toys and unanimously concluded that toys made with DINP are safe.
The DINP is the only phthalate listed in the bill that is used in toys. Hypospadias rates are
declining, sperm counts are not decreasing. In Washington, between 1987 to 2002,
hypospadias did not increase. The lead and cadmium prohibition levels in the bill should be
changed. The lead levels should be set higher at 60 ppm. The age level for children should
be set at six. The dates of implementation may be too soon. A chemcial action plan should
be done for phthalates.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Appropriations)
(In support) The Department of Ecology currently has an innovative program for
polybrominated dyphenyl ethers (PBDE's). Washington is the first state in the country to
pass a PBDE or toxic flame retardant bill to keep these chemicals out of children's bodies
and out of the environment. This bill would ban lead, cadmium, and phthalates from toys,
cosmetics, jewelry, and children's car seats and this the amount of funding in the fiscal note
is a good investment to prevent further medical and environmental problems. We currently
spend millions on health care and on cleaning up the environment because of these
chemicals.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (Select Committee on Environmental Health) (In support)
Representative Dickerson, prime sponsor; Elizabeth Davis, League of Women Voters of
Washington; Graham Wilding; Erika Schreder, Washington Toxics Coalition, and Toxic Free
Legacy Coalition; Dr. Barry Lawson, Academy of Pediatrics, Washington State Chapter;
Cliff Traisman, Washington Conservation Voters; Gretchen Lee, Breast Cancer Fund; Kim
Karu, Childcare Action Council; Brooke Bell; Nick Federici, Washington Toxics Coalition;
Blair Anundson, Wash PRIG; Brekke Hewitt, Wind Up Here; Ryan Kellogg, Public Health -
Seattle and King County; and Carl Nelson, Washington State Medical Association.
(With concerns) Eric Johnson, Washington Public Ports Association; and Mark Johnson,
Washington Retail Association.
(Neutral) Carol Kraege, Department of Ecology.
(Opposed) Harry Fisch and Marian Stanley, American Chemistry Council; and James C.
Lamb, The Weinberg Group.
Persons Testifying: (Appropriations) Clifford Traisman, Washington Environmental Council and Washington Conservation Voters; and Nick Federici, Washington Toxics Coalition.