HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 2881
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed Legislature
Title: An act relating to the practice of dentistry.
Brief Description: Concerning the practice of dentistry.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Health Care & Wellness (originally sponsored by Representatives Hinkle, Kenney and Cody).
Brief History:
Health Care & Wellness: 1/31/08, 2/4/08 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/13/08, 94-3.
Senate Amended.
Passed Senate: 3/6/08, 47-0.
House Concurred.
Passed House: 3/8/08, 93-0.
Passed Legislature.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH CARE & WELLNESS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 13 members: Representatives Cody, Chair; Morrell, Vice Chair; Hinkle, Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Barlow, Campbell, Condotta, DeBolt, Green, Moeller, Pedersen, Schual-Berke and Seaquist.
Staff: Chris Blake (786-7392).
Background:
Applicants for a license to practice dentistry may obtain a license without fulfilling the
examination requirement if they: (1) hold a license in another state where they are actively
practicing; and (2) graduated from a dental school that has been approved by the Dental
Quality Assurance Commission (Commission). The Commission has established rules to
adopt the American Dental Association's Commission on Accreditation (ADACA) standards
for the approval of dental schools and has approved all dental schools accredited by the
ADACA as of 1993. The Commission's rules also require those applicants who graduated
from a dental school that is not accredited by the ADACA, but is either approved by the
Commission or listed by the World Health Organization, to complete at least two additional
pre-doctoral or post-doctoral years of dental education.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
An applicant for a license to practice dentistry in Washington who has not graduated from a
dental school approved by the Commission may obtain a license without meeting the
examination requirement if he or she has practiced dentistry in another state for at least four
years, completed a one year post-doctoral residency approved by the Commission, and met
all other licensing requirements.
By November 15, 2009, the Commission must report to the Governor and the Legislature
with recommended licensing standards for foreign-trained dentists. The recommendations
must consider the balance between maintaining professional quality and having an adequate
supply of dentists in Washington. The recommendations must also consider the use of
standards established by accrediting organizations.
The act expires on July 1, 2010.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Half of the dentists in Washington will retire by 2013 and this bill will help to
fill the void that will be coming. There is a shortage of dentists in Washington, especially
those who work with underserved populations. Thirty-five of 39 counties in Washington are
dental health care professional shortage areas. The shortage is most severe in rural areas and
among underserved populations. There is a lack of Spanish-speaking dentists in Washington.
This bill opens a pathway for qualified, experienced dentists to help alleviate a critical
shortage of dentists in Washington. There are thousands of dentists in other states who
received their education abroad who are excluded from practicing in Washington.
Mexican-Americans have the highest rate of dental decay and are the least likely to visit a
dentist. This bill will increase the number of dentists in Washington, including ethnic
minorities and native Spanish speakers.
(Concerns) There are grave concerns about licensing foreign-trained dentists without
following the current system that requires a two-year dental school residency and a licensing
examination. If the Legislature wants to pursue this, there should be at least five years of
practice and a residency, since most concerns about a new dentist do not arise until after five
years of practice. Over the past few years, there have been several reasonable reforms to the
licensing process so that dentists from other states can practice in Washington. The current
efforts to increase the number of licensed dentists in Washington are working. The
Commission on Dental Accreditation is currently reaching out to dental schools from other
countries to accredit them according to United States' standards. States that have reduced
their licensing standards to bring in dentists from other states have had disciplinary problems
with those dentists.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Janice Palm; and Donald Barker, Commission on Hispanic
Affairs.
(Concerns) John Davis; and David Hemion, Washington State Dental Association.