HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 3230
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Local Government
Title: An act relating to public notification and hearing requirements for permits issued under the shoreline management act.
Brief Description: Changing the public notification and hearing requirements for permits issued under the shoreline management act.
Sponsors: Representatives Conway, Darneille and Flannigan.
Brief History:
Local Government: 2/1/08, 2/4/08 [DP].
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Simpson, Chair; Takko, Vice Chair; Warnick, Ranking Minority Member; Schindler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Eddy, Nelson and Schmick.
Staff: Ethan Moreno (786-7386).
Background:
The Shoreline Management Act (SMA or Act) governs uses of state shorelines. The SMA
enunciates state policy to provide for shoreline management by planning for and fostering "all
reasonable and appropriate uses." The SMA prioritizes public shoreline access and
enjoyment and creates preference criteria listed in prioritized order that must be used by state
and local governments in regulating shoreline uses.
The SMA involves a cooperative regulatory approach between local governments and the
state. At the local level, SMA regulations are developed in local shoreline master programs
(master programs). All counties and cities with shorelines of the state are required to adopt
master programs that regulate land use activities in shoreline areas of the state. Counties and
cities are also required to enforce their master programs within their jurisdictions. Master
programs must be consistent with guidelines adopted by the Department of Ecology (DOE),
and the programs, and segments of or amendments to, become effective when approved by
the DOE.
Each local government must establish a program for the administration and enforcement of a
shoreline permit system. While the SMA specifies standards for counties and cities to review
and approve permit applications, the administration of the permit system is performed
exclusively by the local government. Counties and cities are also required to notify the DOE
of all permit decisions under the SMA.
The SMA requires property owners or developers to obtain substantial development permits
for qualifying developments within shorelines areas. "Substantial developments" are defined
to include both developments with total cost or fair market value exceeding $5,000, or other
amount as adjusted for inflation, and developments materially interfering with normal public
shoreline use.
With some exceptions, local governments must notify the public of all applications for
permits under the SMA. Notice of applications must be given by at least one of the following
methods:
The notices must include a statement that a person desiring to submit written comments
concerning an application, or desiring to receive notification of the final decision concerning
an application, may submit the comments or requests for decisions to the local government
within a specified time frame. Local governments are obligated to forward, in a timely
manner following the issuance of a decision, copies of application decisions to persons
requesting them.
If a public hearing is to be held on an application, notices of the hearing must include a
statement that any person may submit oral or written comments on an application at the
hearing.
Summary of Bill:
Local governments must notify the public of permit applications under the SMA through
three general methods:
If the proposal is for the construction or alteration of a facility that performs or is likely to
perform any of the following actions for large marine vessels, the local government must
mail notice of the proposal to property owners within at least 1,000 feet of the boundary of
the property upon which the substantial development is proposed: construction,
refurbishment, maintenance, repair, or demolition.
Similarly, if the permit application is for the construction or alteration of a facility that
performs or is likely to perform any of the following actions for large marine vessels, the
local government must hold a public hearing on the application: construction, refurbishment,
maintenance, repair, or demolition.
"Large marine vessels" are defined as marine vessels that are 75 feet or more in length.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill relates to an issue in the 27th Legislative District. One of the great new
developments in the district is the revitalization of the Schuster Parkway. A Chinese
reconciliation park has been constructed along this waterfront area with public dollars, yet a
shipyard next to the park is seeking to expand its work on mothballed ships. If the permits
for the expansion are granted, the shipyard's actions will create environmental problems and
affect the shoreline view. The public would like to have more information and a stronger
voice in the permitting processes of the SMA. This bill creates new public involvement
measures in the SMA. The bill should be modified to include provisions for lay-berthing, the
action that is occurring in Tacoma. The bill should also be modified to include a five-day
notice provision and to specify that public hearings must be held before the outcome of a
permit application is determined.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Darnielle; David Riefmann; and Eugene Wiegman.