HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 5050
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House - Amended:
April 9, 2007
Title: An act relating to mileage tolling of nonconforming vehicles.
Brief Description: Modifying the mileage tolling calculation in the motor vehicle lemon law.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Consumer Protection & Housing (originally sponsored by Senators Weinstein, Franklin, Kauffman, Rockefeller, Oemig, Murray, Rasmussen, Keiser and Kohl-Welles).
Brief History:
Commerce & Labor: 3/15/07, 3/30/07 [DPA].
Floor Activity:
Passed House - Amended: 4/9/07, 66-32.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Conway, Chair; Wood, Vice Chair; Green, Moeller and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Condotta, Ranking Minority Member and Chandler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member.
Staff: Sarah Beznoska (786-7109).
Background:
The Motor Vehicle Warranties Act, commonly called the Lemon Law, establishes rights and
responsibilities for consumers and manufacturers of vehicles that are defective. Under the
Lemon Law, the following vehicles are considered "lemon" vehicles:
If a vehicle is a "lemon," the manufacturer must either replace or repurchase the vehicle,
whichever the consumer opts for. However, upon replacement or repurchase, the consumer
must pay a "reasonable offset" to the manufacturer for the consumer's use of the vehicle. The
formula for the amount of the "reasonable offset" is set forth in statute as vehicle mileage
multiplied by the purchase price of the vehicle and then divided by 120,000. The vehicle
mileage used for the formula depends on whether the consumer is the original owner of the
vehicle or a subsequent owner. For subsequent owners, the vehicle milage used for the
formula also depends on whether the consumer chooses repurchase or replacement.
If the consumer is the original owner, the mileage used is the number of miles traveled by the
vehicle while the consumer owned the vehicle that are attributable to the consumer.
If the consumer is a subsequent owner of the vehicle and opts for repurchase, the mileage
used is the number of miles traveled by the vehicle since that subsequent owner purchased or
leased the vehicle. However, if the affected consumer is the subsequent owner and opts for
replacement of the vehicle, the mileage used is the number of miles traveled by the vehicle
since the vehicle was originally purchased by the first owner.
Summary of Amended Bill:
The way mileage is calculated is changed for determining the reasonable offset amount when
a vehicle is considered a "lemon."
When the consumer is the original owner or lessee and the vehicle is a lemon because the
manufacturer has failed to repair its defect, the mileage used for the offset is limited to the
number of miles the consumer drove the vehicle between the original date of purchase or
lease, or the in-service date, and the date of the first attempt to diagnose or repair the defect.
Except in the case of a motor home, if the vehicle is a lemon solely because of the number of
days it has been out of service, then relevant mileage is the number of miles the consumer has
driven the vehicle between the date of purchase or lease, or the in-service date, and the 15th
cumulative day that the vehicle was out-of-service. For motor homes, the 30th cumulative
calendar day out-of-service is used.
When the affected consumer is a subsequent owner or lessee of the vehicle and opts for
repurchase by the manufacturer, the mileage used for the offset is limited to the number of
miles driven by the consumer between the date of purchase, transfer or lease of the vehicle to
the consumer and the date of the consumer's initial attempt to obtain a diagnosis or repair of a
defect that either: (1) results in the vehicle being a lemon; or (2) adds to the vehicle being out
of service for more than 30 cumulative days.
If the affected consumer is a subsequent owner or lessee of the vehicle and opts for
replacement of the vehicle, the mileage used for the offset is the miles driven between the
date of original purchase or lease, or the in-service date, and the date of the first attempt to
diagnose or repair a defect that ultimately results in the vehicle being a lemon.
Except in the case of a motor home, if the affected consumer is a subsequent owner or lessee
of the vehicle and the vehicle is replaced solely because of accumulated days out of service,
the mileage used to calculate the offset is the miles driven between the date of the original
purchase or lease, or the in-service date, and the 15th cumulative calendar day that the
vehicle is out of service. For motor homes, the 30th cumulate calendar day out of service is
used.
"Diagnose or repair" is defined as when a consumer presents the new motor vehicle for
warranty service at a service and repair facility authorized, designated, or maintained by a
manufacturer or a facility to which the manufacturer or an authorized facility has directed the
consumer to obtain warranty services. A new motor vehicle has not been subject to
"diagnose or repair" if the consumer refuses to allow the facility to attempt or complete a
recommended warranty repair, or demands return of the vehicle to the consumer before an
attempt to diagnose or repair can be completed.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill is not complicated. The bill sets back the time period for calculating the
reasonable offset to the date the vehicle should have been declared a lemon instead of the
date it is actually declared a lemon. Under the bill, the consumer would be penalized for the
miles driven between the date of purchase and when the consumer first had a problem with
the vehicle.
(With amendment) Other parts of the Lemon Law specifically provide for different
procedures for motor homes. Mileage is different for motor homes and wear and tear is
different. Motor homes are vehicles that can have multi-state repairs that are difficult to
coordinate. The language that limits the number of offset miles to the period between the
original purchase and the date of the 15th cumulative day out-of-service should be changed
for motor homes. If the idea was to set the trigger for the mileage offset for automobiles at
the 15th day out-of-service mark by cutting in half the total days out-of-service that apply
before an automobile is a lemon, then it only makes sense that the same formula apply to
motor homes. The current statute for motor homes sets the trigger for a lemon by days
out-of-service at 60 days. Applying the same formula as proposed for automobiles, the figure
of 30 days is appropriate for limiting the number of offset miles for motor homes.
(Opposed) Washington has one of the toughest lemon laws in the nation. This bill seeks to
make the Lemon Law stronger. If this bill is enacted, there must be language about what
constitutes the first attempt to repair or diagnose and the first attempt must be the first time
the vehicle is presented for repair and not when a customer calls a customer service line. The
current definition of diagnose or repair in the bill is confusing.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Senator Weinstein, prime sponsor.
(With amendment) Stu Halsan, Recreational Vehicle Industry Association.
(Opposed) Nancee Wildermuth, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers; and Cliff Webster,
General Motors.