HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 5336
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Judiciary
Title: An act relating to protecting individuals in domestic partnerships by granting certain rights and benefits.
Brief Description: Protecting individuals in domestic partnerships by granting certain rights and benefits.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Government Operations & Elections (originally sponsored by Senators Murray, Kohl-Welles, Fairley, Prentice, Regala, Oemig, Tom, Kline, Hobbs, Pridemore, Keiser, Berkey, Franklin, Brown, Weinstein, Rockefeller, Poulsen, Fraser, Jacobsen, Spanel and McAuliffe).
Brief History:
Judiciary: 3/16/07, 3/23/07 [DP].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Goodman, Vice Chair; Flannigan, Kirby, Moeller, Pedersen and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ahern and Ross.
Staff: Trudes Tango (786-7384).
Background:
The issue of rights for domestic partners has been addressed by some cities and other states.
Three states have statewide domestic partnership laws that provide some of the same rights
to domestic partners as are provided to spouses. Many of these rights involve issues with
health care, incapacity, and death.
In Washington, a spouse may provide informed consent for health care for a patient who is
not competent to consent. Health care providers may disclose a patient's health care
information without the patient's consent to immediate family members, which includes a
spouse, or other individuals with whom the patient is known to have a close personal
relationship. Spouses have certain rights regarding cemetery plots and burial in family plots.
Spouses have the authority to consent to autopsies and make anatomical gifts. If a person
dies without a will, his or her spouse has certain inheritance rights and rights to administer
the decedent's estate.
Many cities and some states offer domestic partnership benefits to their employees. In
Washington, the same sex domestic partner of a state employee is eligible to participate in
the Public Employees Benefits Board (PEBB) insurance coverage if the partners have been
together continuously for a minimum of six months, share the same regular and permanent
residence, have a close personal relationship, have agreed to be jointly responsible for basic
living expenses, and meet other conditions.
Under the federal Social Security laws, a person 62 years of age or older may be eligible to
collect retirement benefits on a former spouse's social security record. The person loses
former spouse benefits if the person remarries.
Summary of Bill:
A domestic partnership registry is created in the Office of the Secretary of State (Secretary).
The Secretary's office must create the necessary forms. The forms must be made available at
the Secretary's office, through the county clerks, and on the internet.
Eligibility: Two persons seeking to enter into a state registered domestic partnership must:
Registration: Persons who meet the eligibility requirements may file a signed, notarized
declaration of state registered domestic partnership with the Secretary and pay a filing fee.
The Secretary must provide a certificate of state registered domestic partnership to each
party. The Secretary must permanently maintain records of filed declarations and provide
records of declarations to the state registrar of vital statistics. The Secretary shall establish
the filing fee to cover its costs, provided the fee does not exceed $50.
Domestic Partnerships Created by Other Public Entities: Domestic partnerships created
by subdivisions of the state are not affected by, nor considered to be, state registered
domestic partnerships. If a subdivision chooses, it may use the declaration of state registered
domestic partnership to satisfy the subdivision's registration requirements and shall notify the
Secretary of its decision. The Secretary shall compile a list of all subdivisions using the
state's requirements, post the list on its website, and provide a copy of the list to registering
partners.
Termination: A state registered domestic partnership may be terminated by either party
filing a signed, notarized notice of termination with the Secretary and paying a filing fee. If
the notice of termination is not signed by both parties, the party seeking termination must
also file an affidavit stating either: (a) the other party has been served in writing that a
termination notice is being filed; or (b) the other party could not be found after reasonable
effort and notice was made by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the county
where the residence most recently shared by the partners is located.
Upon receipt of the notice of termination, filing fee, and affidavit (if required), the Secretary
shall register the notice of termination and provide a certificate of termination to each party.
The termination is effective 90 days after the date of filing the notice and paying the filing
fee. A state registered domestic partnership is automatically terminated if either party
subsequently enters into a marriage that is recognized as valid in this state.
Rights Extended to State Registered Domestic Partners: State registered domestic
partners have the same rights as spouses regarding:
Regarding a power of attorney, the appointment of one domestic partner as the other partner's
attorney in fact is revoked when the domestic partnership is terminated. In addition, a
domestic partner who is the principal's physician, physician's employee, or owner,
administrator, or employee of a health care facility treating the principal may still be the
principal's attorney in fact, just as spouses can be. A designation of a partner as the
beneficiary to the other partner's nonprobate asset is revoked upon the termination of the
domestic partnership, unless a court order requires otherwise.
For state employees, a certificate of state registered domestic partnership satisfies the
eligibility requirements for same sex domestic partner benefits under the PEBB.
Nothing in the act affects any remedy available in common law.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) There are many older couples in situations where if they marry they put
themselves in financial difficulties. Same sex couples should be allowed to be there for each
other during times of crisis. It is distressing for same sex couples, who have exchanged
vows, become parents, and are in committed relationships, to not have the same protections
as married people. Some same sex couples have legal documents to allow one partner to
make decisions for the other, but it is impractical to have to bring those documents to the
hospital in emergencies or to have those documents on hand when traveling. The bill gives a
fraction of the rights that married people have. Forbidding families to love and care for each
other does not strengthen marriage. The bill does not repeal the Defense of Marriage Act.
The current law discriminates, and this bill will remedy some of that discrimination.
(Opposed) The bill discriminates against other citizens who are not able to marry, and should
be amended to include siblings and other blood relations that could benefit from the care-taking provisions in the bill. It is reasonable and fair to extend protections to other people
and it will help multi-generational families and immigrant families who care for each other.
The state should not subsidize behavior that should be discouraged. The bill creates a civil
arrangement that is an alternative to marriage for heterosexual seniors. It undermines and
will eventually rival marriage as the rights under the bill are expanded. The bill is not
needed because gays are not discriminated against today. This bill is an advancement of the
homosexual agenda and will justify behavior that is against God.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Alan Fuller; Dave Horn, Lambda Legal; Andrea Jessee;
Carolyn Peterson, United Methodist Clergy; and Kim Merriman.
(Opposed) Renee Lizee; Gloria Mayoh; Cheryl Haskins, Allies for Marriage and Children;
Rick Forcier, Christian Coalition; Antonio Cube, Washington State Catholic Conference;
Bob Higley, Positive Christian Agenda; and Diane Eaton.