HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 5714
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Education
Title: An act relating to instruction in Spanish and Chinese languages.
Brief Description: Creating a pilot program of Spanish and Chinese language instruction.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education (originally sponsored by Senators Roach, Prentice, Rasmussen, Oemig, Clements, Rockefeller, Tom, Fairley, Hobbs, Shin, Swecker, Holmquist, Benton, Stevens, Parlette, Delvin and Kline).
Brief History:
Education: 3/16/07, 3/27/07 [DP].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Quall, Chair; Barlow, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haigh, McDermott, Roach, Santos and P. Sullivan.
Staff: Andrew Colvin (786-7304).
Background:
Currently, there is no requirement for school districts to provide instruction in languages
other than English in elementary schools. High school students must have at least five and
one-half elective credits to graduate, and the study of a world language other than English or
the study of a world culture may satisfy any or all of the elective requirements. In order to
enter a public four-year college or university in Washington, a student must have at least two
years of the same foreign language, Native American language, or American Sign Language.
Washington's Essential Academic Learning Requirements do not cover world languages.
However, the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) has endorsed, for
voluntary use, standards for world language instruction adopted by the American Council on
the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
Although not required, there are elementary schools in Washington that provide foreign
language instruction. At least 21 schools currently operate a dual language program, which
provides instruction for all students in two languages. Nearly all are in Spanish and English.
The John Stanford International Elementary School in Seattle offers dual language programs
in both Spanish and Japanese. Usually this model is used with native speakers of English and
native speakers of another language.
Summary of Bill:
A pilot program is created for two school districts to provide Spanish and Chinese language
instruction in elementary schools. Interested districts must apply for a grant by May 15,
2007, and the OSPI must determine the grant recipients by June 15, 2007. Participating
school districts may use current law to employ people of unusual competence to provide the
language instruction under the general supervision of a certificated staff person. The OSPI
must provide an annual report for the life of the program, including whether the pilot should
be continued, expanded, or modified.
The act expires in July 2009.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect immediately.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) It used to be that many countries around the world were learning English as fast
as possible, in part because English was a primary language of business. However, with the
global economy that we are now in, it is increasingly important for Americans to have
bilingual skills. Having foreign language programs in elementary schools will be a benefit to
our country.
(Opposed) The goals of this bill are good, but allowing non-certificated teachers to teach
under the general supervision of a teacher means that the non-certificated teacher may be
alone in a classroom with the children. Non-certificated language teachers may know the
foreign language, but that does not mean they know how to teach. They may not be aware of
and able to recognize differing learning styles among the students and how to address those
differences. In addition, this bill touches on a core subject, meaning that instruction by
non-certificated teachers would not be in compliance with No Child Left Behind
requirements for highly qualified teachers.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Roach; and Brian Jeffries, Office of the
Superintendent of Public Instruction.
(Opposed) Bob Cooper, Washington Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.