HOUSE BILL REPORT
2SSB 5806
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Higher Education
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to higher education costs.
Brief Description: Regarding tuition limits and billing disclosures.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Schoesler, Shin, Berkey, Delvin, Murray and Kohl-Welles).
Brief History:
Higher Education: 3/28/07, 3/30/07 [DP];
Appropriations: 3/31/07, 4/2/07 [DP].
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Wallace, Chair; Sells, Vice Chair; Anderson, Ranking Minority Member; Buri, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hasegawa, Jarrett, McIntire, Roberts and Sommers.
Staff: Jennifer Thornton (786-7111).
Background:
Legislation enacted in 2005 created a comprehensive education and finance study covering
early learning, K-12, and higher education. This effort, known as Washington Learns, was
comprised of a steering committee chaired by the Governor and advisory committees for each
education sector. The steering and advisory committees were directed to conduct a
comprehensive study of early learning, K-12, and higher education; to develop
recommendations on how the state can best provide stable funding for early learning, public
schools, and public colleges and universities; and to develop recommendations on specified
policy issues. The Washington Learns final report, a culmination of the 18-month study, was
completed in November 2006.
Summary of Bill:
Tuition increases for resident students are capped at 7 percent per year between the 2007-08
academic year and the 2016-17 academic year. A state goal is adopted that total per-student
funding levels (from state appropriations plus tuition and fees) are at least the 60 percentile of
total per-student funding at similar institutions in the Global Challenge States. In defining
comparable per-student funding levels, the Office of Financial Management (OFM) shall
adjust for regional cost-of-living differences, for differences in program offerings and the
relative mix of lower division, upper division, and graduate students, and for accounting and
reporting differences among the comparison institutions.
Without reducing enrollment levels below Fiscal Year 2007 budgeted levels, the OFM will
establish a funding trajectory to reach this goal for each four-year institution and the
community and technical college system by Fiscal Year 2017.
The OFM will report to the Governor, the Higher Education Coordinating Board and the
Legislature on an annual basis, beginning September 2008, with updated estimates of total
per-student funding that represents the 60th percentile funding goal and progress that has
been made towards that goal for each institution.
The Global Challenge States are defined as the top performing states in the new economy
index published by the Progressive Policy Institute. At least once every five years, the OFM
must determine whether there should be changes to the list of states.
On billing statements to students, each institution must report the full cost of instruction, the
amount collected from student tuition and fees, and the difference between the amounts for
the full cost of instruction and student tuition and fees.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The long-term funding strategy for higher education in this bill recognizes the
need for stable and predictable funding levels based on a combination of state resources and
tuition. The goal linked to the Global Challenge States and recognition of state
appropriations and tuition makes for strong financing. The concept of funding benchmarks
and the reference to similar institutions is important and will enable good comparisons for the
system. This bill also has a provision for the Legislature to adjust funding as needed, which
is significant.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Senator Schoesler, prime sponsor; Deborah Frazier, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges; and Terry Teale, Council of Presidents.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 33 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Buri, Chandler, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Hinkle, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kretz, Linville, McDermott, McDonald, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Schual-Berke, Seaquist, P. Sullivan and Walsh.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 1 member: Representative Dunn.
Staff: Debbie Driver (786-7143).
Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Appropriations Compared to
Recommendation of Committee On Higher Education:
No new changes were recommended.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The bill establishes in statute a financing structure in higher education with
important components including establishing a long-term goal, recognizing the relationship
between tuition and state support, and directing the Legislature to review and adjust those
variables as the economy dictates.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Terry Teale, Council of Presidents.