HOUSE BILL REPORT
SB 6014
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Local Government
Title: An act relating to industrial development on reclaimed surface coal mine sites.
Brief Description: Authorizing industrial development on reclaimed surface coal mine sites.
Sponsors: Senators Swecker, Haugen, Keiser, Hatfield, Zarelli, Benton, Hewitt, Stevens, Shin, Marr, Rasmussen, Oemig and Sheldon.
Brief History:
Local Government: 3/27/07, 3/29/07 [DP].
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Simpson, Chair; Eddy, Vice Chair; Curtis, Ranking Minority Member; Schindler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ross, B. Sullivan and Takko.
Staff: Thamas Osborn (786-7129).
Background:
Growth Management Act Requirements for Comprehensive Land Use Plans
Those jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA) must adopt
internally consistent comprehensive land use plans (comprehensive plans), which are
generalized, coordinated land use policy statements of the governing body. Each
comprehensive plan must include certain elements, including land use, housing, and
transportation elements. A comprehensive plan may be updated or amended only once per
year and any such revision must be done in accordance with specified public notice and
participation requirements.
As part of its comprehensive land use plan, a county fully planning under the GMA must
designate urban growth areas (UGAs) or areas within which urban growth must be
encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. The
GMA does, however, permit certain types of development activity outside of UGAs in fully
planning counties.
Among the developments permitted outside of UGAs but which have infrastructure/facilities
needs and other characteristics which are urban in nature are the following: (1) master
planned major industrial developments; (2) industrial land banks; (3) fully contained
communities; and (4) master planned resorts. The GMA contains extensive planning
requirements governing the creation of these categories of development so as to minimize
their impact on the rural environment.
Master Planned "Major Industrial Development"
The GMA planning counties are authorized to establish a process for reviewing and
approving proposals for the siting of specific major industrial developments outside UGAs.
"Major industrial development" means a master planned location suitable for manufacturing
or industrial businesses that:
An eligible county may approve a major industrial development outside a UGA provided the following criteria are met:
Industrial Land Banks
In 1996 the Legislature amended the GMA to authorize a pilot project under which
"industrial land banks" could be established for the expeditious siting of major industrial
development outside UGAs. Among other provisions, the pilot project legislation: (a)
allowed only certain counties to participate in the project, such participation being
contingent, in part, on meeting detailed criteria relating to population, geographic location,
and unemployment statistics; (b) established criteria for siting these developments within
designated banks of land; and (c) provided for amending comprehensive plans adopted under
the GMA to implement these provisions.
"Industrial land bank" (land bank) is defined to mean up to two master planned locations,
each consisting of a parcel or parcels of contiguous land, sufficiently large so as not to be
readily available within the UGA of a city, or otherwise meeting specified criteria. The
definition specifies that the land bank must be suitable for manufacturing, industrial, or
commercial businesses and is specifically designated for major industrial use within the
county's comprehensive plan.
Eligible counties may establish up to two master planned locations for major industrial
activity within a land bank located outside UGAs. Among other criteria for establishing
major industrial developments within designated land banks, eligible counties must provide
for new infrastructure, determine the feasibility of alternate sites, and satisfy specific
development regulation requirements. Additionally, when selecting locations for inclusion
within a land bank, counties must give priority to locations adjacent to, or in close proximity
to, a UGA.
An eligible county must complete a comprehensive planning process before a master planned
location for a major industrial development may be included in a land bank. The planning
process must ensure that the following criteria are met:
Final approval of inclusion of a master planned location in a land bank is an amendment to
the applicable comprehensive plan, but the inclusion or exclusion of master planned locations
may be considered at any time. After a master planned location has been included in a land
bank, manufacturing and industrial businesses that qualify as major industrial development
may be located there.
Land Use Petition Act (Chapter 36.70C RCW)
The Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) is uniform appeal process for land use decisions issued
by local jurisdictions. The LUPA provides an expedited process for the direct appeal to
superior court of final decisions made by local jurisdictions regarding permit applications
pertaining to the use, development, modification, sale, or transfer of real property. The
LUPA does not apply to local land use decisions that must be reviewed by a quasi-judicial
body under state law.
Summary of Bill:
A GMA planning county meeting specified eligibility criteria is authorized to permit master
planned major industrial development on lands outside an urban growth area that have been
formerly used for coal mining. Prior to undertaking the planning for such development, a
county must consult with the cities within the county in order to develop a process for
designating the master planned locations where the industrial activity may take place.
In order to be eligible to engage in the industrial activity authorized under the act, a county
must: (1) have had a surface coal mining operation in excess of 3,000 acres that ceased
operation after July 1, 2006, and (2) that is located within 15 miles of the Interstate 5
corridor.
The siting of the planned industrial development is limited to lands that:
The comprehensive plan for the industrial development must ensure that:
Once a county amends its comprehensive plan to designate a master planned location for the industrial development, the county may approve a specific industrial activity without any further amendment of its comprehensive plan. However, criteria for the approval of a specific industrial activity must be specified in development regulations that include the following requirements:
Although the designation of a master planned location for major industrial activity under this
act must be implemented through an amendment to a county's comprehensive plan, such
amendment is exempt from the GMA requirement limiting a county to one amendment of the
comprehensive plan per year. Accordingly, a county's comprehensive plan may be amended
without limitation for the purposes of the planning authorized under this act.
The GMA requirements for the implementation of master planned major industrial
development (see RCW 36.70A.365) and industrial land banks (see RCW 36.70A.367) are
not applicable to the master planned industrial activity authorized under this act.
Accordingly, the provisions of this act create a third, independent basis for the authorization
of major industrial activity outside of a UGA.
A comprehensive plan amendment designating a master planned location under this act may
be subject to appeal. In addition, a county's subsequent approval of a specific major
industrial activity at the planned location is subject to appeal under the Land Use Petition
Act.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The passage of this bill would greatly help Lewis County recover from the
closure of its open pit coal mine last year. The mine was the county's largest employer and its
closure has had disastrous consequences for the county economy. The county unemployment
rate is among the highest in the state and the redevelopment of the coal mining lands as
authorized under the bill offers the best opportunity for the creation of new jobs and overall
economic recovery. Without the passage of this bill, Lewis County will have a very difficult
time creating the industrial development it needs in order to recover from the mine closure.
The mining company has offered to donate its land to the county and this land is a perfect
place to conduct industrial activity. The bill allows redevelopment of only that land that has
already been subject to coal mining and is applicable to only one site in the county.
Accordingly, allowing the industrial redevelopment of this land would have little or no
environmental impact on the surrounding area.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Bob Gunther, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; Bill Lotto, Lewis County Economic Development Council; Bob Johnson, Lewis County Community Development; and John Hempelman, Carncross and Hempelman.