HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 6100
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Judiciary
Title: An act relating to charitable donations.
Brief Description: Limiting the use of charitable donations in charging decisions.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Judiciary (originally sponsored by Senators Kline and Brandland).
Brief History:
Judiciary: 3/27/07, 3/30/07 [DPA].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill (As Amended by House Committee) |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Goodman, Vice Chair; Rodne, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ahern, Flannigan, Kirby, Moeller, Pedersen, Ross and Williams.
Staff: Bill Perry (786-7123).
Background:
Prosecutors have discretion regarding whether or not to file criminal charges. They may also
amend charges, including reducing charges as the result of plea agreements with a defendant.
Prosecutors may also seek dismissal of charges.
Under the "compromise of misdemeanors" law, charges may also be dismissed if a party
injured by the defendant has a civil remedy for the injury and acknowledges that satisfaction
has been received for the injury. Compromise is not available if the crime involved domestic
violence or was committed against an officer, with intent to commit a felony, or riotously, or
was a crime of domestic violence.
As part of a criminal sentence, various costs, fines and other legal financial obligations may
be imposed by the court. There are several state authorized funds supported by criminal
penalties. These funds include the Public Safety and Education Account, the Judicial
Information Systems Account, the Death Investigations Account, the State Patrol Highway
Account, and various local government accounts.
Over the past several months, it has come to light that in at least one city, charges have been
reduced or dropped in exchange for a defendant's contribution to a charity selected by the
prosecutor.
Summary of Amended Bill:
Prosecutors may not dismiss, amend, or agree not to file a criminal charge or infraction in
exchange for a defendant's contribution or payment to any person or organization.
The prohibition does not apply to:
Amended Bill Compared to Substitute Bill:
The amendment clarifies that costs paid by a defendant for pretrial supervision are among
those payments not prohibited by the bill.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) It shouldn't be necessary to have a law like this, but unfortunately prosecutorial
discretion was abused. In some instances, it appears that DUI charges were actually
dismissed in exchange for cash payments. The bill provides a clear policy statement for local
jurisdictions to follow.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Senator Kline, prime sponsor; and Tom McBride, Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.