HOUSE BILL REPORT
E2SSB 6502
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Environmental Health, Select
Title: An act relating to mercury reduction.
Brief Description: Reducing the release of mercury into the environment.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Oemig, Rasmussen and Kline).
Brief History:
Select Committee on Environmental Health: 2/26/08, 2/28/08 [DP].
Brief Summary of Engrossed Second Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Campbell, Chair; Hudgins, Vice Chair; Chase, Hunt, Morrell and Wood.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Sump, Ranking Minority Member; Newhouse.
Staff: Ashley Pedersen (786-7303).
Background:
Mercury enters the environment through mining, petroleum combustion, coal powered plants,
municipal sewage plants, land-filling and incinerating certain consumer products. Mercury is
deposited on land, air, and water, and eventually finds its way into the food chain and
humans.
Mercury is a persistent, bioaccumulative toxin that can damage the central nervous system
and cardiovascular system in humans. Fetuses, infants, and children exposed to mercury may
have troubles with cognitive thinking, memory, attention, language, and fine motor and
visual spatial skills. Adults who have been exposed to mercury may experience such
symptoms as: tremors, mood swings, insomnia, muscle weakness, headaches, and decreased
performance on tests of cognitive function.
In 2003 the Legislature passed the Mercury Education and Reduction Act. This legislation
included:
The Department of Ecology's (DOE) Mercury Chemical Action Plan conclusions include that a significant amount of mercury released into the state's environment is from disposal of common consumer products such as fluorescent light tubes, thermometers, and thermostats and that many Washington residents are not aware of products that contain mercury, and are likely to improperly dispose of mercury containing products.
Summary of Bill:
State agency facilities, including learning institutions, must recycle their mercury-added
general purpose lights by January 1, 2010. By January 1, 2011, all commercial, industrial and
retail facilities, and office buildings must recycle their mercury-added general purpose lights.
The sale of bulk mercury is prohibited as of June 30, 2009. The prohibition does not apply to
immediate dangerous waste facilities or disposal facilities approved by the DOE.
The DOE must educate all persons regarding the requirements of the chapter and must
research and develop recommendations for implementation and financing of a convenient and
effective mercury-added general purpose light recycling program. In developing these
recommendations, the DOE must consult with the solid waste advisory committee and
stakeholders, including representatives from: residents, small businesses, local governments,
and environmental organizations.
The DOE must participate in national and global mercury forums to advocate reduction of
global emissions and permanent isolation of elemental mercury. By July 1, 2009, the DOE,
in consultation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, must study the feasibility of
the development of a national repository for mercury. The DOE must provide
recommendations to the Legislature by December 1, 2009.
The DOE must provide recommendations for implementing and financing a recycling
program for mercury-added general purpose lights to the Legislature by December 1, 2008.
A violation of this chapter is punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each
violation in the case of a first violation. Repeat violators are liable for a civil penalty not to
exceed $5,000. Penalties collected will be deposited in the State Toxics Control Account.
The exemption for crematories is repealed.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Mercury is a potent neurotoxin and an environmental contaminant. This bill is
timely because of the increased use of fluorescent lamps during the ongoing energy crisis.
However, people may be hesitant to use the energy efficient bulb because of its mercury
content. One of the concerns with disposal of mercury lamps is breakage in garbage cans or
solid waste garbage trucks. This poses a risk to families and to solid waste workers.
This bill will establish a widespread, convenient mercury light recycling program. The
portion of the bill that requires the DOE to consult with stakeholders to develop recycling
program recommendations is very important. The stakeholder process requires consideration
of financing the program, including financing for schools. Further, the schools' fiscal note
may be inaccurate because it calculates the cost of recycling mercury-added lamps at 12 cents
per foot and the current state contract is 6 cents per foot. The schools' calculation also
provides for recycling of four million lamps per year. As there are only about 16 million
fluorescent lamps used and generated in Washington each year, it is unlikely that schools
make up 25 percent of the 16 million total amount.
Finally, this bill requires that the DOE study the issue of establishing a national repository for
mercury. This is important because recyclers will need a place to send the mercury extracted
during the recycling process. The legislation is also well-crafted in that it does not jeopardize
the auto-switch program.
(Neutral) This bill is timely and it provides a pathway forward to deal with the biggest
unregulated mercury waste stream - florescent lights. Previous concerns about whether this
bill would undo prior mercury legislation are now resolved. The legislation does not
jeopardize the auto-switch program. Another important aspect of the bill is that it requires
the DOE to consult with stakeholders to generate recommendations regarding financing the
recycling program.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Senator Oemig, prime sponsor; Craig Lorch, Total
Reclaim; Suellen Mele, Washington Citizens for Resource Conservation; and Gary Smith,
Independent Business Association.
(Neutral) Darin Rice, Department of Ecology.