HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESSB 6665
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House - Amended:
March 12, 2008
Title: An act relating to the intensive case management and integrated response pilot programs.
Brief Description: Regarding the intensive case management and integrated crisis response pilot programs.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Hargrove, Stevens and Marr).
Brief History:
Human Services: 2/25/08, 2/26/08 [DPA];
Appropriations: 3/1/08 [DPA(APP w/o HS)].
Floor Activity:
Passed House - Amended: 3/6/08, 93-0.
Senate Refused to Concede.
Passed House - Amended: 3/12/08, 97-0.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Dickerson, Chair; Roberts, Vice Chair; Ahern, Ranking Minority Member; Walsh, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Darneille, McCoy and O'Brien.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 1 member: Representative Bailey.
Staff: Linda Merelle (786-7092).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended by Committee on Appropriations and without amendment by Committee on Human Services. Signed by 31 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hinkle, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kretz, Linville, McDonald, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Schmick, Schual-Berke, Seaquist, Sullivan and Walsh.
Minority Report: Without recommendation. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Anderson, Chandler and Ross.
Staff: Wendy Polzin (786-7137).
Background:
The House Human Services Committee passed a companion bill, HB 2784, during the 2008
session. That bill, as passed by the House committee, extended both the intensive case
management and the involuntary treatment pilot programs (pilot programs) until June 30,
2009, required the Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP) to submit an
additional interim report by June 2008, and extended the deadline for its final report until
June 2010. The bill passed by the House did not address the new legislation which is
proposed by the Senate bill.
In 2005 the Legislature passed ES2SSB 5763, the Omnibus Treatment of Mental and
Substance Abuse Disorders Act. In addition to other items, this legislation established two
different types of pilot programs designed to serve persons with mental illness and/or
chemical dependency. Under the original legislation, the pilot programs were set to expire as
of June 30, 2008.
Pilot Programs
Intensive Case Management for Chemically Dependent/High Utilization of Crisis Services
Provides intensive case management for chemically dependent persons with history of high
utilization of crisis services. Case managers perform outreach services and connect
individuals to treatment, housing, and support services. The two sites are King County and
Thurston/Mason counties.
Involuntary Treatment – Chemical Dependency and/or Mental Disorder (Integrated Crisis
Response)
These pilot projects are for adults with chemical dependency, mental disorder, or both. With
training, staff, and resources, they provide 24-hour services, seven days per week, for both
integrated services and secure detoxification services in two pilot areas: Sedro Woolley and
Pierce County. They authorize the use of civil commitment options similar to those available
under the mental health statutes.
Summary of Amended Bill:
The expiration provisions for acts authorizing the Intensive Case Management and
Involuntary Treatment pilots are repealed. The operation of the pilot programs is subject to
the funds appropriated for that specific purpose. In addition, the Department of Social and
Health Services may contract for additional pilot program sites, subject to funding for that
specific purpose. The WSIPP is required to submit an additional preliminary evaluation of
the pilot programs by June 30, 2008, and the deadline for the final evaluation report is due by
June 30, 2010.
The amended bill allows the designated crisis responder for the integrated crisis response
pilot program to petition the court for less restrictive treatment in addition to the 14-day
involuntary commitment currently authorized under the statute. The petitioner must show by
clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the further less restrictive treatment is necessary,
and the court may order less restrictive treatment with conditions where a treatment provider
has agreed to supervise the individual pursuant to such conditions.
If the individual does not abide by the conditions of the less restrictive order, the treatment
provider or the designated crisis responder may petition the court for an additional 14-day
involuntary commitment, tantamount to a revocation of the less restrictive treatment
alternative. If, after a hearing, the court finds that the individual has violated conditions, it
may order the involuntary commitment or may allow the individual to continue with the less
restrictive treatment under the same or modified conditions. Upon completion of the 14-day
involuntary commitment, as a result of a revocation, the designated crisis responder can again
seek a 60-day less restrictive treatment alternative with conditions.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Human Services)
(In support) The designated crisis responders do not feel that there will be an additional work
load as a result of this bill. They are not looking for additional funding on the mental health
side. This bill provides an opportunity to serve a population that has fallen through the
cracks. The less restrictive alternative is a cost-savings provision. By having these additional
incentives and accountability, we can hopefully reduce the requirement for emergency
services. The pilot programs in this bill are improving the quality of life and improve cost
savings. The provisions in this bill are the result of working two years with the pilots. The
pilot projects are not asking for additional funding for the less restrictive treatment
alternative.
(Opposed) None.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Appropriations) None.
Persons Testifying: (Human Services) Margaret Rojas, North Sound Mental Health Administration; Larry Van Dyke, North Cascades Secure Detox; Dave Stewart, Pierce County Human Services; and Doug Allen, Department of Social and Health Services, Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse.
Persons Testifying: (Appropriations) None.