HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 6751
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House - Amended:
March 4, 2008
Title: An act relating to allowing individuals who left work to enter certain apprenticeship programs to receive unemployment insurance benefits.
Brief Description: Allowing individuals who left work to enter certain apprenticeship programs to receive unemployment insurance benefits.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce, Research & Development (originally sponsored by Senators Kohl-Welles, Roach, Pridemore, McDermott, Keiser, Franklin and Kline).
Brief History:
Commerce & Labor: 2/21/08, 2/22/08 [DPA].
Floor Activity:
Passed House - Amended: 3/4/08, 62-32.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Conway, Chair; Wood, Vice Chair; Green, Moeller and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Condotta, Ranking Minority Member; Chandler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member.
Staff: Jill Reinmuth (786-7134).
Background:
Individuals are eligible to receive unemployment benefits if they: (1) worked at least 680
hours in covered employment in the base year; (2) are separated from employment through no
fault of their own or leave work for good cause; and (3) are able to work and are actively
searching for suitable work.
Individuals are disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits if they leave work
voluntarily without good cause. "Good cause" means leaving work for the following reasons:
Employers are required to pay contributions (payroll taxes) to finance unemployment benefits, unless they are exempt from coverage or reimburse the Employment Security Department for benefits paid to their former workers. Contribution rates are based, in part, on layoff experience and benefits charged to employers' experience rating accounts. Some benefits are pooled within the unemployment system. These "socialized costs" include "non-charged benefits."
Summary of Amended Bill:
Individuals who leave work to enter certain apprenticeship programs are considered to have
left work for "good cause" and, therefore, are not disqualified from receiving unemployment
benefits. The apprenticeship programs must be approved by the Washington State
Apprenticeship Training Council. Benefits are payable to these individuals beginning
Sunday of the week before the apprenticeship programs begin. Benefits paid to these
individuals are not charged to their employers' experience rating accounts.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The bill came about because of some unintended consequences of 2003
legislation. It would allow leaving work to enter an apprenticeship program to be considered
a "good cause" quit. An individual would not be disqualified from receiving benefits. This
bill particularly impacts individuals entering apprenticeship programs that require classroom
training prior to on-the-job training. We disagree with some assumptions in the fiscal note
(e.g., the anticipated duration of benefits).
(In support with concerns) One tweak is needed to avoid an unintended loophole. Benefits
should not be paid until the individual is in the apprenticeship program, not while the
individual is in the lag period between employment and apprenticeship.
(Concerns) This change departs from the current purposes of the unemployment
compensation program.
(Opposed) Nearly every circumstance that is considered a "good cause" quit is beyond the
individual's control. This change is not needed to encourage people to enroll and stay in
apprenticeship programs. It is unnecessary and unfair.
(Information only) The bill will require 100 additional unemployment compensation
decisions per year. Ongoing administrative costs are minimal.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Randy Loomans, International Union of Operating
Engineers Local 302; Jeff Johnson, Washington State Labor Council and AFL-CIO; and Bob
Abbott, Washington and North Idaho District Council of Laborers.
(In support with concerns) Dave Johnson, Washington State Building and Construction
Trades Council; and Rick Slunaker, Associated General Contractors of Washington.
(Concerns) Donna Steward, Association of Washington Business.
(Opposed) Larry Stevens, Mechanical Contractors Association of Western Washington and
Northwest Washington Independent Electrical Contractors.
(Information only) Jill Will, Employment Security Department.