SSB 6805

HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 6805

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Reported by House Committee On:
Agriculture & Natural Resources
Appropriations

Title: An act relating to promoting farm and forest land preservation and environmental restoration through conservation markets.

Brief Description: Promoting farm and forest land preservation and restoration through conservation markets.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Haugen, Rasmussen, McAuliffe, Kline and Kohl-Welles).

Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 13 members: Representatives Blake, Chair; Van De Wege, Vice Chair; Kretz, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Eickmeyer, Grant, Kristiansen, Lantz, Loomis, McCoy, Nelson, Newhouse and Orcutt.

Background:

Generally, a conservation bank is a market enterprise that offers landowners incentives to enhance habitat or provide protection for other environmental goals, such as the preservation of farm and forest-land. Landowners can profit from selling credits to parties who need to compensate for environmental impacts. This system of credits allows those public or private entities that need or want credits to purchase the credits from those who are awarded credits for projects that provide the enhancement. Through this system, landowners may receive benefits from participation. These banks can function as part of a larger conservation market as a method of achieving environmental policy goals.

Interest is expanding in the use of conservation markets that award various types of
environmental mitigation credits for projects that enhance habitat or other environmental
values. This system of credits allows those public or private entities that need or want credits
to purchase the credits from those who are awarded credits for projects that provide the
enhancement. This option uses market forces to make available incentives to provide these
environmental benefits through a system of credits. Interest exists in examining the use of
conservation markets in a way that takes advantage of environmental enhancement
opportunities that exist on farms and small forestry operations, but that also improve the
viability of these operations without taking whole farms or significant amounts of land out of
production.

Summary of Amended Bill:

The State Conservation Commission (Commission) is directed to conduct a study on the feasibility and desirability of establishing farm and forestry-based conservation markets in Washington. To carry out this study, the Commission may enter into a contract with an entity that has knowledge and experience in agriculture and of conservation markets. The study would include:

   William D. Ruckelshaus Center relating to voluntary approaches relating to critical areas,    and the Office of Farmland Preservation work relating to retaining farmland and
   agricultural production.

The Commission is to present its findings and recommendations on the conservation markets
study to the Governor and the appropriate legislative committees by December 1, 2008.
If the study determines that conservation markets are feasible and desirable, the Commission
must conduct two demonstration projects. To be chosen as a demonstration project area, there needs to be:

mitigation demands.

If the project proceeds to the demonstration project phase, the Commission is to report its
findings and recommendations to the Governor and the appropriate committees of the
Legislature by December 1, 2009.

Amended Bill Compared to Substitute Bill:

The amended bill clarifies that the study is to explore the feasability and desirability of farm and forest-based conservation markets.

Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The bill will help the state to address environmental impacts caused by development, improve the efficiency and effectiveness of mitigation efforts, and save the state money. The state is spending a considerable amount of money on environmental mitigation and restoration work and it is unnecessary to buy or condemn farmland and remove it from agricultural use. Conservation markets provide a voluntary mechanism to provide ongoing revenue to farms to produce environmental benefits and keep farm land in use. This effort could provide the state with a mechanism to benefit both the agriculture industry and the environment, in particular wetland mitigation. A study is needed to show how conservation markets would work. Other states and Europe have used conservation markets which can be used as models.

(Neutral) Ecology supports the concept and would like to be part of the discussions. Because
the bill is not included in the Governor's requested budget, Ecology nor the Commission cannot formally support it. The Commission supports the policies behind the bill. If the project proceeds to the demonstration project stage, the intent is to have one on the west side and another on the east side of the state.

(Opposed) None.

Persons Testifying: (In support) Don Stuart, American Farmland Trust; Dan Wood, Washington Farm Bureau; Mike Ryherd, Clear Valley Environmental Farm; and Bill Robinson, The Nature Conservancy.

(Neutral) Josh Baldi, Washington Department of Ecology; and Ron Schultz, Washington State Conservation Commission.

Majority Report: Do pass as amended by Committee on Appropriations and without amendment by Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources. Signed by 34 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Chandler, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hinkle, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kretz, Linville, McDonald, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Ross, Schmick, Schual-Berke, Seaquist, Sullivan and Walsh.

Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Appropriations Compared to Recommendation of Committee On Agriculture & Natural Resources:

A null and void clause was added, making the bill null and void unless funded in the budget.

Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

We want to make sure that more farmers stay on their land and this bill is only a study but it is very important to the future of the state. There is broad support for this bill in the agriculture and environmental community. This bill was not in the Governor's budget because the policy was not yet developed when her budget was developed. Last session you had a task force on protecting working farms. We now have conservation resource enhancement that pays farms to maintain buffers but now some of those contracts are expiring and we want to replace that with allowing farmers to sell credits for their buffers that would shift funds to the public sector to the private sector.

Persons Testifying: Don Stuart, American Farmland Trust; and Ron Schultz, Washington State Conservation Commission.