Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Judiciary Committee | |
HB 1144
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Title: An act relating to jurisdiction over judgments.
Brief Description: Providing a uniform method of transferring a municipal court judgment into district court.
Sponsors: Representatives Williams, Warnick, Rodne, Campbell, O'Brien, Lantz, Goodman and Moeller.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/23/07
Staff: Trudes Tango (786-7384).
Background:
Municipal courts and municipal departments within district courts have jurisdiction to process
civil and criminal violations of city ordinances, many of which can result in monetary penalties.
Municipal courts and municipal departments do not have jurisdiction to issue orders of
attachment and garnishment, which can be used to enforce monetary judgments. Municipal
courts and municipal departments often assign unpaid money judgments to collection agencies.
District courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the amount at issue is not more than
$50,000. District courts can use garnishment and attachment to enforce judgments. They do not
have authority to issue liens on real property.
Summary of Bill:
District courts are granted jurisdiction over proceedings to civilly enforce any money judgment
from a municipal court or municipal department of a district court. The proceeding may be
brought in the district where the municipal court or municipal department is located. Once
transferred, the municipal judgment is recognized as a judgment of the district court. The district
court may not vacate or amend the judgment. The district court filing fee to transfer the
judgment is $31.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.