Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee | |
HB 1241
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Exempting normal maintenance from the definition of substantial development under chapter 90.58 RCW.
Sponsors: Representatives B. Sullivan, Upthegrove, Kessler and Kretz.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/22/07
Staff: Jaclyn Ford (786-7339).
Background:
The Shoreline Management Act (Act) is intended to ensure that development of shorelines will
promote and enhance the public interest. The Act regulates activities through local shoreline
master programs developed by local governments with policy guidance from the Department of
Ecology. A number of terms are defined in the Act, including "substantial development."
Each of the following is considered to be a "substantial development:" constructing or altering
the exterior of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removing of any sand, gravel, or
minerals; bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent
or temporary nature which interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters
overlying lands subject to the Act.
In general, a development for which the cost or market value is greater than $2,500 or which
materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state is
considered to be a "substantial development."
The construction of a dock, including a community dock, is not considered to be a substantial
development if it is designed for pleasure craft, non-commercial use for single or multi-family
residences, and costs no more than $2,500. Other excepted activities include such things as
construction of normal protective bulkheads for single family residences; construction and
practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching; and construction of a single
family house for personal use that does not exceed 35 feet in height.
A substantial development may not be undertaken on the shorelines of the state without a
substantial development permit. A substantial development permit is obtained from the local
jurisdiction where the activity is to take place. Applying for a substantial development permit
requires public notice, an application, and possible review by the Department of Ecology.
Thus, an exemption from the definition of "substantial development" affords an exemption from
the substantial development permit requirement.
Summary of Bill:
Within the Shoreline Management Act, normal maintenance and repair of existing structures and
developments are exempt from the definition of "substantial development."
The definition for "normal maintenance" includes "those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or
cessation from a lawfully established condition."
"Normal repair" is defined as restoring a development to a state comparable to its original
condition, except where repair causes significant adverse effects to the quality of the
environment. Replacement of a structure or development is authorized as "normal repair" where
replacement is the common method of repair for that type of structure or development.
"Substantial development" also does not include either the construction of a dock or installation
of a freestanding or portable boat lift, or both, designed for pleasure crafts. In addition, either
the dock and/or the boat lift must not exceed $40,000. Or, for community docks, the fair market
value must not exceed $40,000 for the first moorage space plus $10,000 for each additional
moorage space. However, if construction exceeding $5,000 occurs within five years of the
previous construction, then the additional construction is considered "substantial development."
The dollar thresholds established will be adjusted for inflation, based on changes in the
"consumer price index," by the Office of Financial Management (OFM) every five years
beginning in July, 2008. The "consumer price index" is defined as a calendar year's annual
consumer price index for all items in the Seattle, Washington area for urban wage earners and
clerical workers. The OFM must calculate the new dollar threshold and give it to the code
reviser for publication in the Washington State Register at least one month before the new dollar
threshold goes into effect.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 16, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.