Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Select Committee on Environmental Health | |
HB 1355
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Incorporating human health analysis into environmental review under chapter 43.21C RCW.
Sponsors: Representatives Chase, Campbell, Hasegawa and Morrell.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/30/07
Staff: Amy McCormick (786-7290).
Background:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires local governments and state agencies to
prepare a detailed statement, or environmental impact statement (EIS), if proposed legislation or
other major action may have a probable significant, adverse impact on the environment. The
responsible official has authority to make the threshold determination whether an environmental
impact statement must be prepared. Some exceptions to the requirements of SEPA have been
authorized. If the proposed project is categorically exempted, no further environmental review is
needed. If the proposed project is not exempt, an environmental checklist must be prepared to
address the project's potential impacts on the environment. The elements of the environment that
will be evaluated include earth, air, water, plants, animals, energy, environmental health, land
use, transportation, public services, and utilities.
If it appears that the proposal is unlikely to have a significant adverse environmental impact, the
agency will issue a determination of non-significance. If it appears that a probable significant
adverse environmental impact may result, the proposal may be altered or its probable significant
adverse impact mitigated. If this cannot be accomplished, a detailed statement or environmental
impact statement is prepared.
Summary of Bill:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires local governments and state agencies to
prepare detailed statements or environmental impact statements, if proposed legislation or other
major action may have a probable significant, adverse impact on the environment, as well as
human health. A project may be conditioned to mitigate specific adverse environmental and
human health impacts according to SEPA requirements. Human health includes the
consideration of physical, mental, economic, and social well-being and not merely the absence of
disease or infirmity.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 18, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.