Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Finance Committee | |
HB 1509
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Clarifying that the gross wages and benefits of on-site property managers are exempt from the business and occupation taxation of property management companies.
Sponsors: Representatives Pettigrew, Orcutt, O'Brien, McCune, Ericks, Warnick, Alexander, Simpson, Fromhold, P. Sullivan, Morris, Ahern, Kirby, Wood, Buri, Crouse, Kenney, Kristiansen, Ormsby and Dunn.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/13/07
Staff: Rick Peterson (786-7150).
Background:
The business and occupation (B&O) tax is imposed on the gross receipts of business activities
without any deduction for the costs of doing business. However, a business that acts as an agent
for another business is not liable for B&O tax on amounts that merely "pass through" the agent
as reimbursement for expenses incurred by the agent on behalf of the agent's client. For
example, an attorney might pay court costs on behalf of a client. When the attorney is
reimbursed for those costs by the client, the attorney is not liable for B&O tax on the
reimbursements. The attorney is only liable for B&O tax on amounts charged as fees for the
attorney's services.
When a business employs workers on behalf of a client, advances and reimbursement for
payments to the workers are subject to B&O tax if the workers are considered employees of the
business. The workers are considered employees of the person who has control over them. This
is determined by who decides on the hiring and firing the worker; the duration of employment;
the rate, amount, and other aspects of compensation; the worker's job assignments and
instructions; and other factors.
Property owners often hire property management companies to manage their real property.
Frequently, the property management companies also manage the personnel who perform the
necessary services at the property location. The property owners may pay the on-site personnel
through the property management company.
Under legislation adopted in 1998, a property management company is not taxable on amounts
they receive for and pay to an on-site employee under the following: (a) the employee works
primarily at the owner's property; (b) the employee's duties include leasing property units,
maintaining the property, collecting rents, or similar activities; and (c) under the property
management agreement the employee's compensation is the ultimate obligation of the property
owner and not the property manager, and that all actions, including hiring, firing, compensation,
and conditions of employment, are subject to the approval of the property owner.
In October 2006, the Department of Revenue issued an excise tax advisory clarifying that an
on-site employee may work at multiple properties owned by different owners, but the exemption
is only available if a majority (more than 50%) of the services are performed for a single owner
and the exemption only applies only to that single owner's share of the on-site employee's wages
and benefits.
Summary of Bill:
The B&O tax exemption allowed to property managers for payments received for compensation
of on-site employees is expanded by eliminating the requirement that the on-site employee work
primarily at a single property owner's property.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.