HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1627
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Agriculture & Natural Resources
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to farmland preservation.
Brief Description: Creating the office of farmland preservation.
Sponsors: Representatives Linville, Quall, Pearson, Strow, Morrell, Bailey, Conway, Haigh, Rolfes, Springer and Simpson.
Brief History:
Agriculture & Natural Resources: 2/8/07, 2/26/07 [DP];
Appropriations: 3/3/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 10 members: Representatives B. Sullivan, Chair; Blake, Vice Chair; Dickerson, Eickmeyer, Grant, Kagi, Lantz, McCoy, Strow and VanDeWege.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Kretz, Ranking Minority Member; Warnick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hailey, Newhouse and Orcutt.
Staff: Meg Van Schoorl (786-7105).
Background:
State Conservation Commission
The State Conservation Commission (Commission) established in Chapter 89.08 RCW is
charged with a number of powers and duties related to the conservation of renewable natural
resources, including:
keeping them informed about other Districts' activities and experiences and
facilitating interchange and cooperation;
Agricultural Conservation Easements Program (Chapter 89.08.530 and .540 RCW)
In 2002, the Legislature created the Agricultural Conservation Easements Program (Program)
to "facilitate the use of federal funds, ease the burdens of local governments launching similar
programs at the local level, and help local governments fight the conversion of agricultural
lands they have not otherwise protected through their planning processes." The Commission
is required to manage the Program, and is authorized to receive and expend public and
private gifts, grants, or endowments for the benefit of the Program. An Agricultural
Conservation Easements Account (Account) was created in the State Treasury to receive such
gifts, grants and endowments, and expenditures from the Account may only be made to
purchase easements under the Program. The Commission must report to the Legislature on
an ongoing basis regarding potential funding sources and recommendations for changes to
existing funding.
Summary of Bill:
An Office of Farmland Preservation is created within the State Conservation Commission,
with staff support by the Commission. The Farmland Preservation Task Force (Task Force)
is also established, staffed by the Commission, and directed to meet at least twice yearly.
Members are entitled to travel cost reimbursement. The Task Force terminates on January 1,
2011, and has the following membership provisions:# REPRESENTING APPOINTING
AUTHORITY OTHER REQUIREMENTS VOTING MEMBERS 6 Farmers, one from
each of six regions
delineated by the
Commission Governor, from nominees by
recognized agricultural
organizations At least two
representatives must be
under age 45 1 State Conservation
Commission Commission Chair 1 Department of
Agriculture Department Director 1 Counties in eastern
Washington Washington State Association
of Counties 1 Counties in western
Washington Washington State Association
of Counties 2 Senate - one from
each major political
caucus Senate President 2 House - one from
each major political
caucus House Speaker 1 Governor's office Governor 1 Conservation
Districts State Association of
Conservation Districts NON-VOTING MEMBERS (PARTICIPATION TO BE REQUESTED) 1 Federal Natural
Resources
Conservation Service State Conservationist Knowledge of federal
agricultural land retention
programs and funding
sources 1 Department of
Community, Trade
and Economic
Development Department Director Technical expertise
The Office of Farmland Preservation is authorized to:
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) We strongly support this bill because we need to slow the conversion of
farmland to development. Five percent of the state's farm land and 33 percent of the state's
farms are located in Western Washington where there is extreme pressure for development.
Preservation of working agricultural lands is also a food security issue. What we are doing
now by allowing prime agricultural farmland to be divided into hundreds of pieces is more
"in perpetuity" than any easement could be. The land base is eroding out from under
independent producers sprinkled across the state who are trying to compete in the global
economy. Seventy-five percent of agricultural lands have higher value than the value of
production. Agriculture is a generational business. Succession planning should be done in
every county that has agricultural production, and there should be incentives provided for
farmers to stay in business. Those counties that plan under the Growth Management Act are
required to identify and protect agricultural lands of long-term significance, but only a
handful of counties have implemented a program to protect this land base of nearly 36,000
farms that generate $5.3 billion in farmgate value. From 1997 to 2002, we lost over 4,000
farms and 461,000 acres of farmland. The Commission, a non-regulatory agency with
incentive-based programs, is the perfect place for this office.
(Concerns) This bill creates another agency and artificially locks up affordable, buildable
land. We do not agree with granting conservation easements in perpetuity.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Linville, prime sponsor; Kaleen
Cottingham, Futurewise; Carolyn Kelly, Skagit Conservation District; Ellen Bynum, Friends
of Skagit County and Western Washington Agriculture Association; Don Stuart, American
Farmland Trust; and Stu Trefry, Washington Conservation Commission.
(Concerns) Andrew Cook, Building Industry Association of Washington.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 26 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Linville, McDermott, McDonald, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Schual-Berke, Seaquist, P. Sullivan and Walsh.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Buri, Chandler, Dunn, Hinkle and Kretz.
Staff: Alex MacBain (786-7288).
Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Appropriations Compared to
Recommendation of Committee On Agriculture & Natural Resources:
The Appropriations Committee added a null and void clause to the bill.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This bill is long overdue. The conversion of agricultural land is an important
issue in the State of Washington not only because of the loss of the land itself, but also to
understand the economic factors that make farming economically viable. A centralized office
would be helpful in terms of looking at the data, information, and tools to better understand
the causes of the farmland conversion.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Kaleen Cottingham, Futurewise.