Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Judiciary Committee | |
HB 1642
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Title: An act relating to criminal violations of no-contact orders, protection orders, and restraining orders.
Brief Description: Concerning criminal violations of no-contact orders, protection orders, and restraining orders.
Sponsors: Representatives Pedersen, Lantz, Williams, Moeller, Wood, Kirby, O'Brien, Chase, Ormsby and Green.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/7/07
Staff: Trudes Tango (786-7384).
Background:
There are several different types of no-contact, protection, and restraining orders. The provisions
in these orders can vary. For example, domestic violence protection orders may include
provisions: (a) restraining the respondent from committing acts of domestic violence; (b)
excluding the person from another's residence, workplace, school, or daycare; (c) prohibiting the
respondent from coming within a specified distance of a location; (d) restraining the respondent
from contact with a victim of domestic violence or the victim's children; and (e) ordering that the
petitioner have access to essential personal effects and use of a vehicle.
A restraining order issued in a dissolution proceeding may include many of the same provisions
in a domestic violence protection order, and may also: (a) restrain one party from molesting or
disturbing another person; (b) restrain the respondent from transferring, selling, removing, or
concealing property; and (c) restrain the respondent from removing a minor child from the
jurisdiction.
A no-contact order, which can be issued when a person has been arrested or charged with a
domestic violence crime, prohibits the person from having any contact with the victim.
Regardless of the type of order, violations of no-contact, protection, and restraining orders are
punishable under the Domestic Violence Protection Act. Violations of these orders can
constitute contempt of court, a gross misdemeanor, or a felony, depending on the circumstances.
The relevant part of the statute establishing when a violation is a gross misdemeanor reads:
Whenever an order is granted under this chapter, chapter 7.90, 10.99, 26.09, 26.10, 26.26, or
74.34 RCW, or there is a valid foreign protection order as defined in RCW 26.52.020, and
the respondent or person to be restrained knows of the order, a violation of the restraint
provisions, or of a provision excluding the person from a residence, workplace, school, or
day care, or of a provision prohibiting a person from knowingly coming within, or knowingly
remaining within, a specified distance of a location, or of a provision of a foreign protection
order specifically indicating that a violation will be a crime, for which an arrest is required
under RCW 10.31.100(2) (a) or (b), is a gross misdemeanor except as provided in subsections
(4) and (5) of this section.
Some trial courts have interpreted the statute to require that the violation of a restraint provision
be one for which an arrest is required under RCW 10.31.100(2)(a) or (b) in order for the violation
of the order to be a gross misdemeanor. An arrest is required under RCW 10.31.100(2)(a) when,
among other things, the person violates a provision restraining the person from committing acts
of threats or violence. Thus, some trial courts have ruled that a violation of a no-contact order is
a gross misdemeanor when the person violates the restraint provision of the order by committing
acts of threats or violence. Short of acts of threats or violence, a violation of a restraint provision
in an order is punishable as contempt of court.
Summary of Bill:
The provision describing when it is a gross misdemeanor to violate a no-contact, protection, or
restraining order is amended.
It is a gross misdemeanor when a person who is subject to a no-contact, protection, or restraining
order knows of the order and violates a restraint provision prohibiting contact with a protected
party. A violation of a restraint provision does not need to be a violation for which an arrest is
required in order for the violation to constitute a gross misdemeanor.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.