Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Education Committee | |
HB 1661
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Requiring an independent study to identify the cost of basic education.
Sponsors: Representatives P. Sullivan, Santos, Upthegrove, Walsh, Quall, Ormsby, Miloscia, Conway, Schual-Berke, Simpson and Darneille.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/2/07
Staff: Barbara McLain (786-7383).
Background:
Article IX, section 1 of the state Constitution states that it "is the paramount duty of the state to
make ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders[.]" Section 2 of
Article IX requires the Legislature to "provide for a general and uniform system of public
schools." These provisions are typically referred to as the state's obligation to provide a "basic
education."
There have been a number of court cases since the 1970's regarding the state's obligations under
Article IX. In a 1977 case known as School Funding I, Judge Doran found that the state had
neither defined nor fully funded basic education. The Legislature enacted the Basic Education
Act (BEA) that same year. The state Supreme Court affirmed Judge Doran's decision in 1978.
The current educational program defined by the BEA is comprised of: 1) four basic education
goals; 2) specified program requirements such as instructional hours, a 180-day school year, and
instruction in the Essential Academic Learning Requirements; and 3) distribution of resources as
specified in statute and the omnibus appropriations act, including staffing ratios, salaries, and
non-salary costs.
In a subsequent 1982 court case (School Funding II), Judge Doran held that the state's
obligations are not restricted to the formulas and ratios found in the BEA statutes but also include
the statutory programs of special education, bilingual education, remedial education, somebut
not allpupil transportation, and vocational education. The omnibus appropriations act includes
funding formulas and methodologies for each of these programs.
Summary of Bill:
The Washington State Institute for Public Policy (Institute) must conduct a detailed study of the
cost for the state to deliver, through the K-12 public school system, a basic education as defined
by state statutes, the state Constitution, and various court decisions.
The Institute's study must examine four scenarios:
1. based on the current definition of basic education;
2. where the definition would include average class sizes and average salaries for certificated
instructional staff at or near the median compared to other states;
3. where the definition would include average class sizes and average salaries for certificated
instructional staff in the top 10 percent compared to other states; and
4. where the definition would reflect a level of resources equal to the state with the top
performing students, as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
The Institute is allowed to contract with outside sources for portions of the study, but must
maintain control and responsibility for the study as a whole. A progress report is due by January
15, 2008, and a final report is due by November 1, 2008.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.