Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Education Committee | |
HB 1871
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Regarding education system benchmarks and monitoring.
Sponsors: Representative Santos.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/6/07
Staff: Andrew Colvin (786-7304).
Background:
Responsibility for financial management of each school district rests with the local school board
and the superintendent they retain to manage the operations of the school district. However, the
district's financial management is regulated by state law and supervised by the Office of
Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI). The Washington State Auditor audits school
district financial records for compliance with laws and regulations, general accounting practices,
and adequate internal controls.
Each school district develops and adopts its own budget prior to the beginning of each school
year. The budget process is governed by state law (RCW 28A.505) and regulations (WAC
392.123), and on instructions provided by the OSPI. The budget approval and review process
varies slightly between first class and second class school districts, with the second class districts
actually having to receive approval from a budget review committee.
The 2005 Legislature created a comprehensive education study to include examination of early
learning, K-12 education, and higher education. The study effort, chaired by Governor Gregoire,
became known as Washington Learns. Washington Learns issued an interim report in November
2005 and final recommendations in November 2006 for consideration by the Legislature.
As part of addressing quality and accountability, Washington Learns recommended the
development of a financial health monitoring system for the K-12 public schools. In its final
recommendations, Washington Learns found that the current budget review system focuses on
the current school year, and does not provide a long-term, prospective look at school districts'
budget health.
Washington Learns also recommended the creation of a P-20 Council to track progress toward
long-term goals and improve student transitions through the education system. To provide
support for that effort, the recommendation included the development of an education data
center, which would compile and analyze student data from the various educational agencies.
Finally, Washington Learns recommended the use of Global Challenge States as a guide to
measure educational performance and status. The Global Challenge States are the top eight
performers on the New Economy Index, which compares states on twenty-one indicators that
measure how well they are positioned to compete in the new economy.
Summary of Bill:
Financial health ratings system for school districts. The Office of the Superintendent of
Public Instruction (OSPI) and the Office of Financial Management (OFM) are directed to identify
up to six system measures for a public financial reporting system, and to develop a financial
health outlook rating system consisting of three categories. Based on a school district's six
system measures, the district will be placed in one of the three financial health outlook
categories.
Each school district's financial health outlook category will be published annually, and updated
as needed. Those districts in the lowest two categories will receive technical assistance from
regional financial specialists contracted through educational service districts.
The six system measures and the financial health outlook rating system shall be presented to the
Governor by November 1, 2007, and subject to agreement between the Governor and the OSPI,
will be implemented during the 2008-09 school year.
Education data center. The education data center shall be established within the OFM, and will
conduct analyses of education issues across the P-20 system. The education data center will
provide the data and analyses to support the P-20 Council, as well as assist other state education
agencies in establishing benchmarks and determining progress relative to those benchmarks. To
accomplish this, the education data center will work with the various state education agencies
and institutions to develop data sharing and research agreements.
Global Challenge States. The OFM will review the list of Global Challenge States at least
every five years to determine if changes to the list are appropriate, and issue a report of its
findings to the Governor and the Legislature.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 30, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.