Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Local Government Committee | |
HB 1965
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Authorizing major industrial development within industrial land banks.
Sponsors: Representatives Eddy and Curtis.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/13/07
Staff: Ethan Moreno (786-7386).
Background:
Growth Management Act/Urban Growth Areas
The Growth Management Act (GMA or Act) is the comprehensive land use planning framework
for county and city governments in Washington. Enacted in 1990 and 1991, the GMA
establishes numerous requirements for local governments obligated by mandate or choice to fully
plan under the Act (planning jurisdictions) and a reduced number of directives for all other
counties and cities. Twenty-nine of Washington's 39 counties, and the cities within those
counties, are planning jurisdictions.
The GMA directs planning jurisdictions to adopt internally consistent comprehensive land use
plans, which are generalized, coordinated land use policy statements of the governing body.
Comprehensive plans must address specified planning elements, each of which is a subset of a
comprehensive plan. Planning jurisdictions must also adopt development regulations that
implement and conform with the comprehensive plan. Except in limited circumstances,
comprehensive plan amendments may be considered by the governing body of the planning
jurisdiction no more frequently than once per year.
The GMA includes numerous requirements relating to the use or development of land in urban
and rural areas. Among other planning requirements, counties that fully plan under the GMA
(planning counties) must designate urban growth areas (UGAs) or areas within which urban
growth must be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in
nature.
Major Industrial Development/Industrial Land Banks
In 1996 the Legislature enacted a pilot project authorizing the establishment of major industrial
development locations outside of UGAs for the purpose of expeditiously siting qualifying
development. Among other provisions, the pilot project legislation included criteria for siting
these developments within designated banks of land; provided for amending comprehensive
plans to implement these provisions; and specified eligibility criteria and termination dates for
relevant county authority. The provisions of the original pilot project have been amended
several times to modify the applicable criteria and termination dates.
Under current law, planning counties meeting specific population, unemployment, and
geographic requirements may, in consultation with cities, establish a process for designating a
bank of one or two master planned locations for major industrial activity outside of UGAs. A
county that has established or proposes to establish an industrial land bank (land bank) must
review the need for a land bank within the county, including a review of the availability of land
for industrial and manufacturing uses within the UGA, during specific comprehensive plan and
development regulation reviews and evaluations mandated under the GMA.
Definitions and Limitations
"Major industrial development" means a master planned location suitable for manufacturing or
industrial businesses that:
The major industrial development may not be for the purpose of retail commercial development
or multitenant office parks.
"Industrial land bank" means up to two master planned locations, each consisting of a parcel or
parcels of contiguous land, sufficiently large so as not to be readily available within the UGA of
a city, or otherwise meeting certain criteria, suitable for manufacturing, industrial, or commercial
businesses and designated by the county through the comprehensive planning process specifically
for major industrial use.
Siting Requirements
A master planned location for major industrial developments outside of a UGA may be included
in the land bank for the county if certain criteria are met through the completion of a
comprehensive planning process ensuring, in part, that:
The process for reviewing and approving proposals to site specific major industrial developments within an approved land bank must ensure through adopted development regulations that specific provisions, including the following, are met:
In selecting master planned locations for inclusion in the land bank, priority must be given to
locations that are adjacent to, or in close proximity to, a UGA.
Final approval of inclusion of a master planned location in a land bank is an amendment to the
applicable comprehensive plan, but the inclusion or exclusion of master planned locations may
be considered at any time. After a master planned location has been included in a land bank,
manufacturing and industrial businesses that qualify as major industrial development may be
located there.
Nothing in the major industrial development/land bank provisions alters the requirements for a
county to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act.
Termination Dates and Eligibility Criteria
Two distinct termination dates and sets of eligibility criteria pertaining to population,
unemployment, and geographic requirements exist for counties choosing to engage in the process
including or excluding master planned locations from a land bank. In the first set of criteria, the
authority of qualifying counties to engage in this siting or exclusion process terminates on
December 31, 2007. However, locations included in a land bank on or before the 2007 deadline
remain available for major industrial development if siting provisions are met. The second set of
eligibility criteria terminated on December 31, 2002. As with the 2007 termination provision,
qualifying locations included in a land bank remain available for major industrial development if
siting provisions are met.
Summary of Bill:
The requirements for designating master planed locations for major industrial developments
outside of UGAs are revised. A master planned location for major industrial developments may
be approved through a two-step process: (1) designation of a land bank in the applicable
comprehensive plan; and (2) subsequent approval of specific major industrial developments
through a local master plan process.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
The applicable comprehensive plan must identify locations suited to major industrial
development because of proximity to transportation or resource assets. The comprehensive plan
must identify the maximum size of the land bank and any limitations on major industrial
developments based on local factors, but the plan need not specify particular parcels or identify
any specific use or user.
In selecting locations for the land bank, priority must be given to locations that are adjacent to, or
in close proximity to, a UGA.
The environmental review for amendment of the comprehensive plan must be at the
programmatic level and, in addition to a threshold determination, must include:
Final approval of a land bank must be by amendment to the comprehensive plan, but the
amendment may be considered at any time. Approval of a specific major industrial development
within the land bank requires no further amendment of the comprehensive plan.
Development Regulations Amendments
In concert with the designation of a land bank, a county must also adopt development regulations
for review and approval of specific major industrial developments through a master plan process.
The master plan process must ensure, at a minimum, that:
Termination Dates and Eligibility Criteria
Although two distinct sets of eligibility criteria remain for counties choosing to engage in the
process including or excluding master planned locations from a land bank, the December 31,
2002 and 2007 termination dates are deleted. One population criterion that a county must satisfy
under the first set of eligibility criteria, applicable under current law until December 31, 2007, is
deleted.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 7, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.