HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2026
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
March 8, 2007
Title: An act relating to recruiters' access to high school students.
Brief Description: Regarding recruiter access to student records.
Sponsors: By Representatives Santos, McDermott, Haigh, P. Sullivan, Ericks, Simpson, Ormsby and Hasegawa.
Brief History:
Education: 2/16/07, 2/23/07 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/8/07, 58-38.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Quall, Chair; Barlow, Vice Chair; Haigh, McDermott, Santos and P. Sullivan.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Assistant Ranking Minority Member and Roach.
Staff: Anne Woodward (786-7119) and Barbara McLain (786-7383).
Background:
The federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) prohibits schools from
releasing student education records without parental consent. An exception allows schools to
release student directory information, such as a student's name, address, and telephone
number, provided that the schools give the students' parents a reasonable time to inform the
school that the information should not be released without parental consent.
Federal law also requires schools and school districts that receive federal funds to provide,
upon request by a military recruiter, access to secondary students' names, addresses, and
telephone numbers. A student or parent may opt-out of having the student's information
released to recruiters by notifying the school that the student's information is not to be
released. Schools must notify parents of the opt-out option and comply with any requests.
The law also requires school districts that receive federal funds to provide military recruiters
with the same access to high school students that the school generally grants to institutions of
higher education or to prospective employers of the students.
There are also state requirements that apply to school districts that allow prospective
employers and recruiters from postsecondary institutions to have access to the school campus
and to student information. Under Washington law, these school districts must allow the
same access to military recruiters.
Summary of Bill:
Any school or school district that allows military recruiters to have access to students or
student records must provide the same type of access to recruiters and representatives of the
Job Corps, Peace Corps, and AmeriCorps. Schools may only release student or family
information as permitted by the federal FERPA.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This state has a strong commitment to national service. Information about high
school students should be equally available to civilian service organizations in our country.
In every community in Washington, you can find organized groups of young people engaged
in the highest level of service learning and benefiting their communities at the same time.
The Department of Defense surveys students between 16 and 26 years old to predict who may
enlist and what things might induce them to enlist. They have found that students do not
recognize that service in the civilian sector through organizations like the Job Corps, Peace
Corps, and AmeriCorps is service to this country. Military recruiting offers post-secondary
vocational training as part of its appeal, and students should know that Job Corps, Peace
Corps, and AmeriCorps also offer post-secondary vocational training. The FERPA
requirements on notification are somewhat vague, and in order for a district to comply with
the opt-out portions in No Child Left Behind and FERPA, the school district can simply put
an advertisement in the paper. It might be important to consider developing a more uniform
mechanism so that more attention is paid to the opt-out option.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Santos, prime sponsor; and E. Richard Power, Friends Committee on Washington Public Policy.