Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Select Committee on Puget Sound | |
HB 2071
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Regarding the management of resources in aquatic rehabilitation zone one.
Sponsors: Representatives Eickmeyer, Upthegrove, Blake, Flannigan and Rolfes.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/16/07
Staff: Jason Callahan (786-7117).
Background:
Aquatic Rehabilitation Zone One
Aquatic rehabilitation zones may be designated by the legislature for areas whose surrounding
marine water bodies pose serious environmental or public health concerns. The Aquatic
Rehabilitation Zone One (ARZ-1) was designated in 2006 and includes all watersheds that drain
to Hood Canal south of a line projected from Tala Point in Jefferson county to Foulweather Bluff
in Kitsap county [RCW 90.88.010]. Rehabilitation of ARZ-1 is authorized in Mason, Jefferson,
and Kitsap counties, with the Puget Sound Action Team serving as the lead state entity, and the
Hood Canal Coordinating Council serving as the local management board [RCW 90.88.020].
Wildstock Geoduck Harvest Management Plans
Wildstock geoduck resources and the commercial geoduck fishery are generally managed jointly
by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The MOU gives the
WDFW primary responsibility for conducting resource assessments and setting the total amount
of geoduck that can be harvested annually. The DNR has primary responsibility, according to the
MOU, for managing the state harvest and sale of geoducks, including planning and location of
state sales.
Pursuant to a federal district court decision, Washington shares management authority over the
geoduck fishery with tribal co-managers. US v. Washington, 873 F. Supp 1422 (1994) [often
referred to as the "Rafeedie decision" after the judge who decided the case]. The Rafeedie
decision, and a later decision [US v. Washington, 898 F. Supp 1453 (1995)] describe how the
court expects the state and the tribes to share equal portions of the sustainable harvest biomass of
any shellfish species, including geoduck. The state and tribal co-managers are directed by the
court to enter into management plans to implement the decision and to comply with the terms of
all management plans.
WDFW and DNR agreed in the MOU to jointly represent the state delegation in conversations
with area tribes concerning the state-tribal management of the subtidal geoduck fishery. Both
state agencies agreed to work together in adopting a unified state position on geoduck
management prior to presenting the state position to the tribal co-managers. The signatures of
both state agency directors appear on management plans entered into by the state and tribes.
Fisheries Management
The primary state lead for fisheries management in ARZ-1 is the Fish and Wildlife Commission
(Commission), which sets fishing seasons and take allowances, along with the WDFW, which
implements the Commission's policies. As with shellfish, the fisheries resources within ARZ-1
are co-managed by both the state and tribal governments.
Summary of Bill:
Fisheries Management
The Commission is directed to adopt rules applicable only to ARZ-1 that prohibit the recreational
harvest of groundfish and the subtidal commercial harvest of all fish species other than
hatchery-raised chum salmon.
The Commission is further directed to use the unharvested fish for conservation of the fish
species and the overall marine ecosystem of ARZ-1.
Geoduck Management
The DNR and the WDFW are prohibited from entering into any management agreements that
would allow for the commercial harvest of any subtidal geoducks in ARZ-1 south of a line
projected from Jefferson County's Brown Point to Kitsap County. North of that line, commercial
harvest of subtidal geoduck must be limited to quantities no greater than 70 percent of the
maximum allowable harvest for geoduck tracks in that area.
In addition, the DNR, when developing management plans or agreements with the WDFW, may
not include the geoduck biomass existing in ARZ-1 as part of a larger management plan for
Puget Sound geoduck resources. Instead, the geoduck located in ARZ-1 must be managed as a
discrete resource.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 7, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.