Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Education Committee | |
HB 2095
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Creating performance-based compensation pilot projects for staff in public schools.
Sponsors: Representatives Jarrett, Priest and Moeller.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/20/07
Staff: Barbara McLain (786-7383).
Background:
In Washington, state funding for teacher salaries is allocated through a statewide salary schedule
based on a teacher's years of experience and level of education, including continuing education.
School districts are not required to use the statewide schedule, but are required to comply with
certain limits on the average salary paid to teachers in the district and the salaries paid to
individuals with bachelor's or masters' degrees and no other experience. Funding for
cost-of-living increases required by Initiative 732 is calculated using the statewide salary
schedule. There are no state allocation schedules or limitations with regard to salaries for
classified school employees.
The use of a salary schedule for teachers based on experience and education has been a standard
practice across the nation for many years. During the late 1980's, some states and school districts
began to experiment with new approaches to teacher compensation that involve knowledge and
skill-based pay, performance pay linked to student achievement, and other factors. States such as
Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Texas, along with major school districts such as Denver and
Chicago, are implementing various forms of performance-based compensation for teachers.
Although each approach is different, it is common for the state to outline the basic parameters for
the compensation model and then direct school districts to develop the actual salary schedule and
performance evaluation process. The state education agency then approves the district's proposal
before it is implemented. In most cases, states that have adopted performance-based
compensation have started with pilot projects involving selected school districts. Additional
funding may be authorized to implement the new compensation plan.
Summary of Bill:
A performance-based compensation pilot project for staff in public schools is established for up
to five school districts. School districts apply by submitting a proposal to the Superintendent of
Public Instruction (SPI) by November 1, 2007. The proposal must be signed by the school board
and bargaining representatives for certificated and classified staff. Proposals must include
commitment of time during the planning year to develop a performance-based compensation
agreement and identify the extent that learning improvement days and supplemental contract
resources will be used to support the project.
The SPI selects up to five pilot projects by January 31, 2008. Participants, in collaboration with
their bargaining representatives, develop their agreements during the remainder of 2007-08 and
submit them for SPI approval by July 15, 2008. Agreements must:
Before approval, the SPI ensures the required components of the agreements are clearly detailed
and in compliance with state laws, and that the agreements are legally binding beginning with the
2008-09 school year.
For the five-year duration of the pilot project, school districts receive $115 per student in
addition to state salary allocations to be used in combination with salary allocations to pay for the
agreements. Approved agreements are exempt from laws pertaining to salary lid compliance.
Cost-of-living adjustments under Initiative 732 are calculated using only the statewide salary
allocation, not including the additional pilot project amounts.
The Washington State Institute for Public Policy (Institute) evaluates the pilot projects and
reports to the Legislature by December 1, 2012. The pilot projects expire September 1, 2013.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.