Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Local Government Committee | |
HB 2182
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Creating more uniform districting requirements for large and small port districts.
Sponsors: Representatives Hudgins, Schual-Berke, McDermott, Cody, Upthegrove and Santos.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 4/19/07
Staff: Thamas Osborn (786-7129).
Background:
General Powers and Authority of Port Districts
Port districts are authorized for the purpose of acquisition, construction, maintenance, operation,
development, and regulation of harbor improvements, rail or motor vehicle transfer and terminal
facilities, water and air transfer and terminal facilities, or any combination of these facilities.
Among the general powers granted to ports are the following:
Port District Board of Commissioners
Port districts are governed by a board of commissioners consisting of either three or five
members in accordance with specified statutory criteria. As a general rule, port districts must
have three commissioners, unless the population of the district equals or exceeds 500,000
persons. Once this population threshold has been reached, a ballot proposition must be
submitted to district voters asking whether or not the number of district commissioners should be
increased from three to five. If the voters approve increasing the number of commissioners to
five, statute provides procedures for the election of the two additional commissioners.
In addition, statute provides two alternative procedures by which any port district may increase
its number of commissioners from three to five regardless of the population of the port district.
One procedure allows a port commission to adopt a resolution calling for addition of two
commissioners which is then submitted to district voters for their approval. The second
procedure allows district voters themselves to petition for a five member commission. If the
petition meets specified statutory criteria, the issue is then presented for decision by the voters at
the next general or special election.
Port Commissioner Representation by District
Every port district that is not coextensive with a county having a population of 500,000 or more
persons must be divided into separate commissioner districts for each commissioner, each having
approximately equal population. Accordingly, by implication, port districts whose boundaries
are coextensive with county having a population of at least 500,000 persons are not required to
be divided into individual commissioner districts.
Port districts in which each commissioner represents an individual commissioner district are
subject to the following election provisions:
"At Large" Commissioner Representation
A port district that is less than county-wide may cease using individual commissioner districts
provided the elimination of commissioner districts is approved by the voters in accordance with
one of the two following procedures:
Summary of Bill:
Every port district with a population of at least one million persons must have five port
commissioners and be divided into commissioner districts of approximately equal population.
Such port district must comply with the following election provisions:
All port districts must be divided into individual port commissioner districts, unless otherwise
exempted from this requirement by statute.
Any port district is authorized to cease using commissioner districts provided the elimination of
such districts is approved by a majority of the voters through a ballot proposition meeting
specified procedural requirements.
The act provides transitional electoral procedures for port districts with populations of at least
one million persons that do not meet statutory requirements regarding the requisite number of
commissioners or the division into commissioner districts.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on April 16, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.