Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Local Government Committee | |
HB 2484
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Concerning ad hoc review board processes for annexation proposals.
Sponsors: Representatives Moeller and Dunn.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/15/08
Staff: Ethan Moreno (786-7386).
Background:
Current law authorizes multiple methods for municipal annexations. While code and non-code
cities and towns have separate statutory requirements for governance and operation, the
annexation methods employed are generally similar. A summary of the methods is as follows:
In 2003 the Legislature also enacted a new annexation method by which certain cities and towns
planning under the major provisions of the Growth Management Act may annex qualifying
territory by ordinance if specific requirements, including the negotiation of interlocal agreements
between the participating jurisdictions, are satisfied.
Annexation Review Bodies - Boundary Review Boards and Temporary Review Boards
Annexations may be subject to review by a Boundary Review Board (Board), a review body
authorized in statute to guide and control the creation and growth of municipalities in
metropolitan areas. While statute provides for the establishment of Boards in counties with at
least 210,000 residents, current law provides that a Board may be created and established in any
county.
If a qualifying annexation proposal affecting a non-code city or town is made in a county that is
not subject to a Board, the mayor of the affected city or town must convene a temporary
annexation review board (temporary board) consisting of the chair of the applicable county
commission, the Director of the Department of Community Trade, and, Economic Development,
and two citizen appointees. The mayor also serves on the temporary board, and statute allows
alternates to be designated in place of the temporary board members.
The temporary board, within three months, must determine whether the annexation would be in
the public's interest and welfare, and whether it is in the best interest of affected local
governments and political subdivisions. Additionally, governing officials of these local
governments and subdivisions must assist the temporary board in its review efforts.
In making a determination for or against annexation, the temporary board is guided by, but not
limited to, specified factors, including:
A favorable determination by the temporary board is an essential condition precedent to the
annexation of territory to a city or town under the resolution/election or petition/election
methods.
Upon receipt by the county commissioners of a temporary review board's determination favoring
an annexation initiated by resolution/election method, the commissioners, or the city or town
legislative body for a qualifying municipality, must establish an annexation election date that
conforms with specified timing requirements.
If the proposed annexation is to be executed through the resolution/election or petition/election
method, and if the area proposed for annexation is less than ten acres and has an assessed
valuation of less than $800,000, the temporary board review procedures are dispensed with.
Summary of Bill:
Statutes and references related to temporary annexation review boards in non-code cities and
towns are repealed.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.