Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Technology, Energy & Communications Committee | |
HB 2521
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Mapping internet and computer resources in the state.
Sponsors: Representative Hudgins.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 1/15/08
Staff: Kara Durbin (786-7133).
Background:
In the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Congress directed the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) and state regulatory commissions to "encourage the deployment on a
reasonable and timely basis of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans."
The term "advanced telecommunications capability" is used by the FCC to describe services and
facilities with an upstream (customer-to-provider) and downstream (provider-to-customer)
transmission speed exceeding 200 kilobits per second (kbps). The FCC uses the term
"high-speed" for those services with over 200 kbps capability in at least one direction.
The term "broadband service " generally refers to the high-speed transmission of electronic
information. Several different types of technologies can be used to provide broadband service,
including DSL, cable modem, satellite, remote DSL, broadband over power lines, wireless
internet service providers, and Wi-Fi networks.
National Broadband Surveys:
According to a 2006 survey by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), a variety of
characteristics related to households and services influences whether consumer purchase
broadband services. The GAO found that households with higher incomes were more likely to
adopt broadband than lower-income households, and those households with a college-education
head of household were more likely to purchase broadband than those households headed by
someone who did not graduate from college. While the GAO found that rural households are
less likely to adopt broadband, their findings indicate that this difference may be related in part
to the lower availability of broadband in rural areas. In addition, the GAO identified the price of
broadband service as a barrier to adoption for some consumers.
State Study:
The Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) received an appropriation of $160,000 in
the 2007-2009 Operating Budget (Budget) to conduct a survey to "identify factors preventing the
widespread availability and use of broadband technologies." Specifically, the Budget directed
the UTC to collect and interpret reliable geographic, demographic, cultural, and
telecommunications technology information to identify broadband disparities in the state. In
conducting the study, the UTC must consult with appropriate stakeholders in designing the
survey. The UTC must report its findings to the Legislature by December, 31, 2007.
Summary of Bill:
Study of Broadband Owned by Public Entities: The Utilities and Transportation Commission
(UTC), in consultation with the Department of Information Services (DIS) must conduct a
detailed study of telecommunications infrastructure and radio frequency bandwidth that is
owned, licensed, or otherwise controlled by public entities in the state.
The study must include:
The study must also indicate what broadband services are available by census tract and by block,
lot, or other uniquely identifiable administrative characteristic.
In areas that do not have public broadband infrastructure, the UTC must estimate: (1) the
amount of broadband connectivity needed in a given area to meet the unmet demand; and (2)
possible reasons for why there is not coverage in a given area, if feasible.
The UTC, in consultation with the DIS, must identify any excess capacity and bandwidth that
could be leased on a nondiscriminatory and commercially reasonable basis by public entities.
Survey of Retail Broadband Communications Services: The UTC, in consultation with the DIS,
must conduct a detailed survey of the actual retail availability of wireline, wireless, and
fixed-wireless broadband communications services across the state. This survey must be used to
create a map of all broadband resources available in the state.
The survey must determine:
The survey must be organized by census tract and specifically set forth the unmet demand for
broadband services by census tract and by block, lot, or other unique identifiable administrative
characteristic.
In areas where broadband is not generally and readily commercially available, the UTC must
estimate: (1) the amount of broadband connectivity needed in such areas to meet the unmet
demand; and (2) possibly reasons why coverage may not be available in a given area, if feasible.
Status Report: By December 1 of each year, the UTC must update both the study of broadband
owned by public entities and the survey of retail broadband in order to track the expansion and
progress of broadband access in the state and submit a report to the Legislature.
Availability of Wireless Internet Services: By December 1, 2008, the UTC, in consultation with
the DIS, must compile a database and a web page listing of all free wireless internet services that
are available to the public in the state. This database and web page must describe the exact
location of each wireless access point, and any login information that may be required for
gaining access. The database must be updated on at least a monthly basis.
Availability of Community Technology Programs: The UTC, in consultation with the DIS, must
identify and make publicly available by December 1, 2008, a web directory of facilities
providing community technology programs throughout the state. This directory must be updated
on at least an annual basis.
"Community technology program" is defined in the bill as a program engaged in diffusing
information and communications technology in local communities, particularly in underserved
areas.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 9, 2008. Fiscal note available on a previous draft of the bill (H-3953.1).
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.