Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Higher Education Committee | |
HB 2783
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Regarding transfer and articulation between institutions of higher education.
Sponsors: Representatives Wallace, Chase, Anderson, Sells, Haigh, Roberts, Hasegawa, Morrell, Sullivan, Kenney and Hudgins.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 1/21/08
Staff: Andi Smith (786-7304).
Background:
Direct Transfer Agreement: The HECB is responsible for establishing a statewide transfer of
credit policy and agreement, in cooperation with the public institutions of higher education and
the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC). Together, these entities have
created the Direct Transfer Agreement, or DTA. Any student who completes an approved DTA
associate degree at a community college is considered to have satisfied the lower division general
education requirements at a public four-year institution. These students are generally admitted as
juniors when they transfer.
Course Equivalency: Outside of DTA associate degrees, each four-year institution determines
how courses earned at another college or university meet general education requirements and
apply toward requirements for a major, or count toward a baccalaureate degree. At some
institutions this determination is made by faculty within each college or department. To assist
students, each institution has created guides to illustrate course equivalency: which courses from
which institutions are considered equivalent to which courses at the receiving institution.
However, there is no statewide system of course equivalency in Washington.
Most students complete a DTA associate degree before they transfer, but about 30 percent
transfer before completing a degree. For these students, unless the community college has a
special articulation agreement, each four-year institution makes a separate determination
regarding whether the students' courses meet its general education requirements.
Transfer Associate Degrees: In the late 1990s, analysis of students' credit accumulation and
graduation patterns revealed that transfer students in science, math, and other highly structured
majors did not graduate as efficiently as non-transfer students. When they arrived at a four-year
institution, these students needed to take additional lower division course requirements to qualify
for their major.
To address this problem, the (COP), the HECB, and the SBCTC convened a work group to
develop a statewide Associate of Science Transfer Degree (AS-T), which was adopted in 2000.
Under the AS-T, students take more math and science prerequisites while at the community
college, with the objective of transferring directly into a major once they reach a four-year
institution.
More recently, the HECB asked that the Joint Access Oversight Group (JAOG) develop Major
Related Programs (MRPs). An MRP is based on the DTA or AS-T but specifies the prerequisite
coursework that will provide the best preparation for entry into certain competitive majors. In
2005, the workgroups completed four MRPs: nursing, elementary education, pre-engineering,
and engineering technology. In 2007, the group completed additional programs in secondary
education, earth and space science, and construction management.
Regional and National Accreditation: There are many legitimate agencies that accredit schools
across the United States and they can be broadly grouped into two categories: regional and
national. Regional accreditors cover a section of the United States, for instance the Northwest
Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) covers a seven state region including
Alaska, Montana, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, Utah, and Nevada. All public two and four-year
institutions in Washington are regionally accredited by NWCCU. National accreditors cover
schools across the United States and sometimes abroad. They started as associated schools with
a common, relatively narrow theme and thus, nationally accredited schools have traditionally
been for-profit trade schools and colleges of technology.
The main issue for students regarding accreditation is the transferability of credit. While
nationally accredited institutions will usually accept transfer credits from regional institutions,
regional institutions will not typically accept transfer credits from national institutions. This
means that if a student earns an associate degree from a nationally accredited school, they may
have to start over if they transfer to a regionally accredited school.
Web-based Advising and Academic Planning Systems: The HECB must design a statewide
system of course equivalency as well as a strategy to communicate course equivalency to
students, faculty, and staff. In 2004, the HECB convened a workgroup that jointly established a
strategy to create a single website through which students could determine equivalent courses for
any public two or four-year institution in the state. Roughly 30 other states have some level of
web-based advising in place. In its most robust form, web-based advising sites help student audit
progress toward a degree, explore program requirements for different majors at different schools,
"chat" online with transfer advisors and apply for admission to institutions.
Summary of Bill:
The bill has several separate but related provisions.
Transfer Student Bill of Rights
The HECB must convene a workgroup to develop a list of rights guaranteed to students who
have earned a transfer associate degree under the direct transfer agreement. The list must be
easily accessible on each institution's website as well as in admissions, transfer, and recruiting
offices. The list must include institutional policy regarding admission to an institution, the
number of credits that will generally transfer, the academic requirements fulfilled by the transfer
degree, the acceptance of credit earned in dual enrollment and accelerated programs, and the
acceptance of credits from non-regionally accredited institutions. The list must also include
advance knowledge of selection criteria for limited access programs.
Common Course Numbering
The HECB must convene a workgroup to develop a common set of course numbers for lower
division courses that are generally accepted in transfer between two and four-year institutions and
between four-year institutions. The system developed by the baccalaureate institutions should
match common course numbers used in the community and technical college system, to the
extent possible.
The HECB will collaborate with the work group and submit a progress report to the appropriate
committees of the legislature by December 2009.
Flags for Transferable Courses
The HECB must convene a workgroup to develop a system of identification for generally
transferrable courses. The identifier must clearly distinguish courses that transfer from two-year
institutions to four-year institutions, regardless of whether the student has completed a transfer
associate degree. These courses would typically be in subject areas like English Literature, Earth
Science, Political Science, Mathematics, etc. The system of identification may also include a
separate identifier for courses that transfer but aren't offered at a wide array of institutions.
Institutions must include the system of identification in course catalogs, in hard copy form and on
the Web.
Monitor Progress and Success
The HECB must convene a workgroup to develop a plan to monitor the progress and success of
transfer students over time. The plan must contain several indicators, listed below. The plan
must also include analysis recommendations regarding the barriers that transfer students face in
attaining their degrees and recommendations to address those barriers.
The HECB must collaborate with the workgroup and the SBCTC and report to the appropriate
committees of the legislature by January 2009 and every two years thereafter.
Web-based Advising Development Group
The HECB must convene a workgroup to develop a detailed plan for developing and
implementing a statewide web-based academic planning tool. The plan must include
recommendations regarding the functions that should be included in the web site, options for
development, i.e. the report should answer the "build it v. buy it" question, and costs associated
with development options.
The HECB must report to the appropriate committees of the Legislature by December 15, 2008.
List of Non-regionally Accredited Courses Accepted in Transfer
Public two and four-year institutions must publish a list of all courses that will be accepted in
transfer from non-regionally accredited institutions. Non-regionally accredited institution is
limited to those that are fully accredited by a national accrediting agency recognized by the
United States Department of Education.
The list must not only include the courses that will be accepted in transfer, but also a designation
of the following conditions of transfer:
If institutions do not accept credits from non-regionally accredited institutions, the college or university must explicitly state the policy in a way that students and their families can easily access.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 16, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.