HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2996
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Commerce & Labor
Title: An act relating to placing averse agents in antifreeze.
Brief Description: Requiring aversive agents in antifreeze products.
Sponsors: Representatives Loomis, Dunshee, Simpson and Morrell.
Brief History:
Commerce & Labor: 1/29/08, 2/4/08 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Conway, Chair; Wood, Vice Chair; Condotta, Ranking Minority Member; Chandler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Crouse, Green, Moeller and Williams.
Staff: Alison Hellberg (786-7152).
Background:
The Washington State Department of Agriculture Weights and Measures Program promotes
marketplace equity in commercial transactions through testing and inspecting of commercial
devices, price verification, package inspection, public education, monitoring fuel quality, and
investigating complaints.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Any engine coolant or antifreeze manufactured or distributed in the state after January 1,
2010, that contains more than 10 percent ethylene glycol shall contain denatonium benzoate
at a minimum of 30 parts per million and a maximum of 50 parts per million as an aversive
agent so as to render the product unpalatable.
These requirements apply to manufacturers, packagers, distributors, recyclers, or sellers of
engine coolant or antifreeze, but not to those who install engine coolant or antifreeze for
compensation. This does not apply to the sale of a motor vehicle that contains engine coolant
or antifreeze, or to wholesale containers of 55 gallons or more of engine coolant or antifreeze.
Manufacturers must maintain a record of the trade name, scientific name, and active
ingredients of any aversive agent used and make this information available to the public upon
request.
A person subject to these requirements is not liable for any personal injury, death, property
damage, damage to the environment or a natural resource, or economic loss that results from
the inclusion of denatonium benzoate in engine coolant or antifreeze.
Local governments are pre-empted from adopting or continuing in-effect requirements
different from, or in addition to, these requirements.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The provisions of the original bill are deleted. Any engine coolant or antifreeze
manufactured or distributed in the state after January 1, 2010, containing more than 10
percent ethylene glycol is required to also contain denatonium benzoate as an aversive agent.
The liability of those subject to these requirements is limited to the extent that any damage is
caused by the inclusion of the aversive agent. Local governments are pre-empted from action
different from, or in addition to, these requirements. These requirements are codified under
the chapter dealing with Weights and Measures, which authorizes inspection and
enforcement by the Department of Agriculture.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This is a small bill with a big emotional impact. More than 10,000 animals are
killed each year from ingesting antifreeze. There are also cases of children being poisoned
and antifreeze being used for murder. Many groups support this and it will be amended to
provide for a more appropriate effective date, limiting liability, and naming the aversive
agent.
(In support with questions) Recyclers of antifreeze sell at a retail level and would be required
to use a bittering agent. The question is whether a recycler is also a manufacturer. People
often come in to get their own antifreeze recycled. This is done for compensation, but is not
really manufacturing or selling. It is unclear how recyclers would be treated.
(Concerns) This would be a good bill with some changes. The bill should strike an
appropriate balance between protecting animals and running a business. This bill also needs
an enforcement agency. Oregon and New Mexico have similar laws and those can be used as
a model. The states can coordinate on this.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Loomis, prime sponsor; and Inga Gibson,
Humane Society of the United States.
(In support with questions) Jerry Smedes, Emerald Services, Inc.
(Concerns) Bill Stauffacher, Consumer Specialty Products Association.