Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness Committee | |
HB 3161
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Requiring certain sex offenders to pay the costs of electronic monitoring.
Sponsors: Representatives Smith, O'Brien, McDonald, McCune, Takko, Pearson, Bailey, Ahern, Herrera, Kristiansen, Haler, Warnick, Schindler, Sump, Orcutt, Kretz, Walsh, Hasegawa, Jarrett, Roach, Williams, Simpson, Morrell, Rodne, Kelley, Dunn and Hurst.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/31/08
Staff: Jim Morishima (786-7191).
Background:
Sex offenders may be sentenced to a term of community custody under a variety of
circumstances. For example, a court may impose up to a year of community custody for an
offender sentenced to a year or less in jail. A court must impose 36 - 48 months of community
custody for most offenders sentenced to more than a year in prison. Offenders sentenced to
"determinate plus" sentences are sentenced to a term of community custody up to the statutory
maximum for their offenses.
While on community custody, offenders are subject to a variety of conditions. For example,
unless waived by the court, the terms of an offender's community custody must include:
The court may impose a variety of conditions of community custody, including:
In addition, the DOC is also authorized to impose conditions of community custody as long as they do not conflict with any court-ordered conditions. For a sex offender who is not under the authority of the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB), the conditions the DOC may order include electronic monitoring. For a sex offender under the authority of the ISRB pursuant to a "determinate-plus" sentence, the DOC may recommend, and the ISRB may order, the offender to be placed on electronic monitoring.
Summary of Bill:
The DOC, or the ISRB, depending on which has authority over the offender, must recover the
costs of any electronic monitoring from the offender to the extent that the offender is financially
able.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 25, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.