Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Finance Committee | |
HB 3259
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Addressing the financing and operation of port districts.
Sponsors: Representatives Hunter, Hudgins, Schual-Berke, Upthegrove and McIntire.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/1/08
Staff: Jeff Mitchell (786-7139).
Background:
Port districts are authorized for the purpose of acquisition, construction, maintenance, operation,
development, and regulation of harbor improvements, rail or motor vehicle transfer and terminal
facilities, water and air transfer and terminal facilities, or any combination of these facilities.
Port districts are governed by a board of commissioners consisting of either three or five
members in accordance with specified statutory criteria.
Port districts may levy a general purpose property tax up to 45 cents per thousand dollars of
assessed value. Currently, seventy-three port districts levy this tax. Ports district also have
authority to levy a property tax exclusively dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on
general obligation bonds. This tax does not have a specific statutory rate cap. Currently, nine
port districts levy this tax. Port districts also have authority to levy two other property taxes at a
rate of 45 cents per thousand dollars of assess value. These taxes must be used for industrial
development or dredging, canal construction, or land leveling or filling purposes.
A port districts ability to levy a property tax is unique in that districts are not subject to the one
percent constitutional limit on taxation. However, port districts are subject to the one percent
statutory revenue limit. This limit requires a district's tax rate to be reduced as necessary to limit
the total amount of property taxes to the highest property tax amount in the three most recent
years, plus 1 percent, plus an amount equal to last year's tax rate multiplied by the value of new
construction in the district. This limit acts to reduce district rates below the maximum rate
allowed for the district. The law allows taxing districts, including port districts, that have
voluntarily imposed property taxes below the maximum revenue limit to calculate the revenue
limit as if the district had imposed the maximum. The difference between the actual tax amount
levied and the maximum allowable amount is called "banked levy capacity."
Port districts may issue general obligation bonds. The amount of outstanding nonvoter approved
indebtedness is limited to one-fourth of one percent of the value of the taxable property in the
district. Upon approval by at least three-fifths of the voters, a port district may increase the
amount of outstanding indebtedness to three-fourths of one percent of the value of the taxable
property in the district.
Summary of Bill:
Until July 1, 2010, a port district with a population of one million or more is prohibited from
using banked levy capacity to pay or secure bonds issued after the effective date of the bill.
A government accountability and review committee on port district finance, governance, and
management is created. The committee is directed to: (a) examine the finance, governance,
expenditure, and management of Washington port districts as well as port districts in other states
and countries that compete with Washington port districts; (b) study alternative funding and
taxation mechanisms for Washington port districts; (c) examine the potential consolidation of
port districts or port district operations; (d) examine the potential separation of air and sea port
operations; and (e) consider whether large port districts should be governed wholly or partially
by county legislative authorities. The committee consists of four legislative members and six
members recommended by the governor from various local governments to serve as an advisory
panel. The committee is required to report its initial actions to the governor and appropriate
legislative committees by December 1, 2008, and to report its final findings and
recommendations to the same bodies by December 1, 2009.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 28, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.