Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Higher Education Committee | |
HB 3263
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Requiring dual credit strategic planning.
Sponsors: Representatives Wallace, Kenney, Kagi and Ormsby.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/4/08
Staff: Andi Smith (786-7304).
Background:
A variety of education programs allow high school students to earn post-secondary course credit
while also earning credit toward high school graduation. Examples of dual credit programs
include Running Start, College in the High School, Tech Prep, and International Baccalaureate.
Students who participate in these dual credit programs have the opportunity to graduate from
high school with all or a portion of their intended college course work already completed.
In College in the High School, students complete college level work while staying on their high
school campuses. High school teachers typically form a relationship with a college or university
and receive adjunct, extension, or lecturer status. They work with a professor to align a
particular high school course with a college level course published in the college catalog. The
college course is then taught to high school students by the high school teacher during the regular
school day. Students usually pay a fee for this program that varies based on the area of study.
Other funding, fees, and eligibility requirements are negotiated by participating schools through a
local contract.
Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate also allows students to take
college-level courses while staying on their high school campuses. For both of these programs,
students complete courses taught by high school teachers but then must pass a standardized
examination at the end of the course. Credit is awarded based a student's score on the exam. For
Advanced Placement, students score from zero to five points. Credit is usually awarded for
scores of three or higher, though each college or university determines the required scores for
their respective institutions. Minimum scores to qualify for credit may also vary by subject area.
Running Start is a somewhat different model. Through the program, students have an
opportunity to study on a college campus while acquiring credits that count toward both high
school and college graduation. The students take courses from college faculty and do not pay
tuition for Running Start classes. If the student passes the college course, he or she receives the
same amount of credit as any other college student taking the course. The state provides funding
that covers the amount of time the students spend in either high school or college. School
districts retain seven percent of the basic education allocation and provide the remainder to
colleges or universities.
Tech Prep is a cooperative effort between K-12 schools, community and technical colleges, and
the business community to develop applied integrated, academic and technical programs. These
professional technical courses are taught on high school campuses by high school instructors.
The instructors work with local colleges to assure the courses are taught at the college-level and
articulate to the college program. Each of the state's 22 Tech Prep consortia have developed
competency- based articulation agreements between high schools and colleges that help students
transition from high school into post-secondary professional technical programs. Through Tech
Prep articulation agreements, colleges award credit to students who successfully complete
college-equivalent courses and programs with a "B" or better while still in high school.
Articulation agreements between the individual college and school define the criteria for
equivalency and the granting of credit.
Summary of Bill:
The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction must convene a workgroup including
representatives from the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, the Workforce
Training Education and Coordinating Board, the Higher Education Coordinating Board, and the
Council of Presidents to develop a strategic plan for statewide coordination of dual credit
programs.
For each program, the workgroup must articulate the purpose and definition, goals, personnel
required to administer and teach each program, benefits, and barriers to access. The workgroup
must also specify the average cost for each program to the student, the state, the common
schools, and the institutions of higher educations.
The workgroup must recommend a strategic plan for coordinating the administration of dual
credit programs based on these findings. The strategic plan must set goals for increased student
enrollment, identify strategies to increase access and efficiency, as well as options for addressing
costs to the state, schools, and institutions of higher education. The plan must also contain
strategies to contain costs for students and their families.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 31, 2008.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.