HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 3332
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Commerce & Labor
Title: An act relating to financial negotiations between civil service unions and institutions of higher education following October 1st.
Brief Description: Regarding financial negotiations between civil service unions and institutions of higher education following October 1st.
Sponsors: Representatives Conway, Green, Grant, Pettigrew, Sullivan, Fromhold, Priest, Simpson and Kenney.
Brief History:
Commerce & Labor: 2/4/08, 2/5/08 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE & LABOR
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Conway, Chair; Wood, Vice Chair; Green, Moeller and Williams.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Condotta, Ranking Minority Member; Chandler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Crouse.
Staff: Jill Reinmuth (786-7134).
Background:
The Personnel System Reform Act of 2002 (Act) requires the Governor to submit requests
for funds necessary to implement collective bargaining agreements to the Legislature. The
requests for funds must not be submitted to the Legislature unless two conditions are met.
First, the requests must be submitted to the Director of the Office of Financial Management
(Director) by October 1 prior to the legislative session at which the requests are to be
considered. Second, the requests must be certified by the Director as being financially
feasible for the state.
The Act specifies that the Legislature must accept or reject the request for funds necessary to
implement the agreements as a whole. If a significant revenue shortfall occurs, as declared
by either the Governor or the Legislature, modifications to the agreements must be
negotiated. The terms of an expired collective bargaining agreement remain in effect until a
new agreement is negotiated, not to exceed one year. After one year, the employer may
unilaterally implement according to law.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The Legislature may act upon a unit's initial collective bargaining agreement if: (1) the unit's
representative was certified during or after the legislative session; and (2) the agreement is
submitted to the Office of Financial Management and the legislative budget committees prior
to the Legislature's final action on the budget or the supplemental budget.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
Language providing a process to request funds when the parties do not reach agreement by
October 1 is stricken.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 3, 2008.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Our union has negotiated several master agreements under the Personnel System
Reform Act (Act). This bill corrects a few things in the Act.
It gives the parties a safety valve if they are in mediation or fact-finding. It also deals with
bargaining units that are certified during the interim and for which there is no master
agreement.
(With concerns) There are a number of specific concerns. First, there is a need for a concrete
deadline so the Governor and the Legislature can make budget and policy decisions. The
October 1 deadline has worked well during the last two bargaining cycles. The parties have
successfully met those deadlines. Second, there is an awareness of the need to deal with
late-certified bargaining representatives.
There have been two rounds of succesful negotiations. The October 1 deadline is valuable to
both sides. There is a willingness to look at making some changes for new bargaining units.
There is a technical concern about the language on page 2, line 35. Instead of mediation or
fact-finding, it should be mediation and fact-finding. Otherwise, parties could request
mediation just before the deadline and the Public Employment Relations Commission would
be caught unaware of workload demands.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Leslie Liddle, Public School Employees of Washington.
(With concerns) Diane Leigh, Office of Financial Management Labor Relations Office; Lou
Pisano, University of Washington Council of Presidents; and Ken Latsch, Public
Employment Relations Commission.