Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Finance Committee | |
HJR 4205
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Amending the Constitution to limit property valuation increases for the state property tax.
Sponsors: Representatives Morrell, VanDeWege, Hurst, O'Brien, Kelley, Sells, Kessler, P. Sullivan, Green, Flannigan, Linville, Conway, Kenney, Wallace, Appleton, Blake, Ormsby, Lantz and Ericks.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/26/07
Staff: Mark Matteson (786-7145).
Background:
Property taxes - general requirements and limitations. Property subject to property tax is
assessed at its true and fair value. This includes both real estate and personal property. In most
cases true and fair value is the market value in the property's highest and best use. The values are
set as of January 1st. These values are used for determining property bills to be collected in the
following year. The constitution requires the property tax to be uniform on real estate. A
constitutional amendment has been adopted to allow timber, farm and agricultural land, and open
space land to be valued based on current use rather than the highest and best use standard under
the true and fair valuation approach.
The constitution limits the sum of property tax rates to a maximum of 1 percent of true and fair
value, or $10 per $1,000 of value. Levies that are subject to the 1 percent rate limitation are
known as "regular" levies, and there is no constitutional voting requirement for regular levies. The
constitution does provide a procedure for voter approval for tax rates that exceed the 1 percent
limit. These taxes are called "excess" levies. The most common excess levies are maintenance
and operation levies for school districts and bond retirement levies. The constitution provides
that excess levies must obtain a 60 percent majority vote plus meet a minimum voter turnout
requirement.
In order to implement the 1 percent constitutional rate limit, the Legislature has adopted statutory
rate limits for each individual type of district. The state levy rate is limited to $3.60 per $1,000 of
assessed value; county general levies are limited to $1.80 per thousand; county road levies are
limited to $2.25 per thousand; and city levies are limited to $3.375 per thousand. These districts
are known as "senior" districts. Junior districts like fire, library, and hospital districts each have
specific rate limits as well. In addition, there is an overall rate limit of $5.90 per thousand for
most districts. The state property tax and a specific list of local levies, such as emergency medical
services, conservation futures, and affordable housing, are not subject to the $5.90 limit.
In addition to the rate limitations, a district's regular property tax levy is limited by a statutory
maximum growth rate in the amount of tax revenue that may be collected from year to year. The
limit requires a reduction of property tax rates as necessary to limit the growth in the total amount
of property tax revenue received to the lesser of one percent or inflation, generally. The revenue
limitation does not apply to new value placed on tax rolls attributable to new construction, to
improvements to existing property, to changes in state-assessed valuation, or to construction of
certain wind turbines. In areas where property values have grown more rapidly than 1 percent per
year the 101 percent revenue limit has caused district tax rates to decline below the maximum
rate.
Property taxes - mechanics. The county assessor determines assessed value for each property.
Except for the state levy, the county assessor also calculates the tax rate necessary to raise the
correct amount of property taxes for each taxing district. The assessor calculates the rate so that
the individual district rate limit, the district revenue limit, and the aggregate rate limits are all
satisfied. The tax bill is determined by multiplying the assessed value of the property by the tax
rate for each taxing district in which the property is located.
The state property tax is allocated to the counties based on the market value of taxable property
within each county. This process is called equalization of the state property tax. The Department
of Revenue studies the relationship between the value assigned by the county assessor and the
market value of each county and makes an adjustment to the share of the state levy allocated to
the county. For example, if a county is assessing at 90% of market value then the state makes a
10% adjustment. If a county is assessing at 80% of market value the state makes a 20%
adjustment. The ratio of assessed value to market value is called the assessment ratio. The
equalization process prevents counties from shifting their market value share of the state property
tax to other counties by under-assessing property.
The portion of the state property tax allocated to each county changes each year based on
changes in the market value of property and new construction. Counties in which property is
growing at faster rates will receive a slightly larger share of the state property tax.
Home equity loans and other transactions in which the property is used as collateral. In recent
years, the mortgage equity withdrawal (MEW) market has expanded rapidly. This market is
defined by efforts of homeowners to convert equity in their homes into cash by borrowing against
the value of their homes, and includes refinancing transactions and home equity loans. From 2000
to 2005, the amount of such lending activity grew from 3 percent of disposable income to almost
8 percent.
Summary of Bill:
For the purposes of the state property tax levy, the constitution is amended to limit generally the
true and fair value of real property to the lesser of the assessed value or 101 percent of the prior
year's value.
The amendment provides an exception to the limitations for the following circumstances, in which
case the true and fair value is the fair market value of the property:
(1) the property is sold or transferred; or
(2) the property is used to secure a transaction, unless the transaction is used to provide funds for
the purposes of long-term care expenses, health care expenses, or education.
True and fair value includes declines in value due to the damage or destruction of property and
includes increases in value as a result of new construction. New construction does not include the
value of replacement property following a declaration of a disaster by the governor, if the value of
the replacement is comparable to the value before the disaster occurred.
The proposed amendment provides that the legislature may adopt legislation to enact the
amendment. Changes apply to state levy for collection in calendar 2008 and thereafter.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 19, 2007.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect upon approval of the voters at the November 2007
general election.