HOUSE BILL REPORT
SB 5123
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House - Amended:
April 11, 2007
Title: An act relating to protecting persons with veteran or military status from discrimination.
Brief Description: Protecting persons with veteran or military status from discrimination.
Sponsors: By Senators Hobbs, Kilmer, Roach, Jacobsen, Shin, Fairley, Marr, Prentice, Carrell, Murray, Rasmussen, Keiser, Berkey, Haugen, Franklin, Hatfield, Eide, Kauffman, Fraser and McAuliffe.
Brief History:
State Government & Tribal Affairs: 3/20/07, 3/30/07 [DPA].
Floor Activity:
Passed House - Amended: 4/11/07, 90-7.
Brief Summary of Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT & TRIBAL AFFAIRS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Hunt, Chair; Appleton, Vice Chair; Chandler, Ranking Minority Member; Armstrong, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Green, Kretz, McDermott, Miloscia and Ormsby.
Staff: Alison Hellberg (786-7152).
Background:
Washington's Law Against Discrimination (WALD) establishes that it is a civil right to be
free from discrimination based on race, color, creed, national origin, sex, sexual orientation,
age, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, or the use of a trained dog
guide or service animal. This right applies to employment; places of public resort,
accommodation, assemblage, or amusement; and real estate, credit, and insurance
transactions. To effectuate the right to be free from discrimination, the law defines certain
practices as being unfair.
The Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) is responsible, in part, for
administering and enforcing the WLAD. The WSHRC receives and investigates complaints
made by persons alleging unfair practices in violation of the WLAD. If the WSHRC finds
that there is reasonable cause to believe that discrimination has occurred, it must first try to
eliminate the unfair practice via conference and conciliation. If this process fails, the
WSHRC must refer the matter to an administrative law judge who may, after a hearing on the
matter, issue an order providing relief to the complainant.
Summary of Amended Bill:
The Law Against Discrimination is expanded to prohibit discrimination based on a person's
honorably discharged veteran or military status. "Honorably discharged veteran or military
status" means a person who is a veteran or an active or reserve member in any branch of the
Armed Forces of the United States, including the National Guard, Coast Guard, and Armed
Forces Reserves. "Veteran" is a person who has received an honorable discharge or a
discharge for medical reasons with an honorable record and who has served in at least one of
the following capacities:
The jurisdiction of the Human Rights Commission is expanded to include honorably
discharged veteran or military status as a basis for prohibiting discrimination in employment;
places of public resort, accommodation, assemblage, or amusement; and real estate, credit,
and insurance transactions.
A creditor may consider whether a person is a covered member or a dependent of a covered
member in connection with an application for consumer credit. A "covered member" is
defined as a member of the Armed Forces who is on active duty under a call or order of more
than 30 days or on active Guard and Reserve Duty. It is not an unfair practice or a denial of
civil rights for a creditor to refuse to offer, deny, to offer different terms and conditions, or to
otherwise place restrictions on an extension of consumer credit offered to or entered into with
a covered member or a dependent of a covered member.
The term "disabled person" is replaced with "person with a disability" throughout the WLAD.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Problems have been seen when returning combat veterans search for work.
Employers will ask whether the veteran will have a mental breakdown or whether the veteran
would have a problem working with employees who are against the war. These questions are
not relevant. All that is relevant is whether the veteran is qualified for the job and whether he
or she was honorably discharged. This kind of discrimination is rare, but the state should
make efforts to prevent it so today's veterans do not have to relive the experience of Vietnam
veterans. Veterans have historically had trouble finding work when they return, they are
often turned away from jobs. Many complaints are lodged, but the Human Rights
Commission has not had the authority to respond to them.
(In support with amendment) The amendment is necessary to ensure that financial institutions
are not put into the position of having to choose whether to break federal or state law. The
Talent amendment restricts the ability of institutions to lend to service members and their
dependents. The proposed amendment would make sure that complying with this federal law
does not put them in violation of the Law Against Discrimination.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Senator Hobbs, prime sponsor; Skip Dreps, Northwest
Chapter for Paralyzed Veterans of America; and Frosty Hulsey, Veterans Legislative
Coalition.
(In support with amendment) Denny Eliason, Washington Bankers Association; and Gary
Gardner, Boeing Employees Credit Union.