Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Appropriations Committee | |
SSB 5174
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Making corrections in the public retirement systems.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Pridemore and Schoesler; by request of Select Committee on Pension Policy).
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 3/15/07
Staff: David Pringle (786-7310).
Background:
Cross-References to the Public Safety Employees' Retirement System
Pension benefits received by Washington citizens from private trusts, annuities, and pension
plans are grouped in state law under the name "employee benefit plans" and are generally exempt
from execution, garnishment, or seizure unless federal law provides a mechanism for doing so.
The plans of the Washington retirement systems, with the exception of the Public Safety
Employees' Retirement System (PSERS), are similarly exempt from legal process but through
state-specific laws, rather than the general provisions of the private plans.
Sections of state law relating to consolidation of local government entities that may have Public
Employees' Retirement System (PERS) members and Public Safety Employees' Retirement
System members permit PERS members to either join PERS or elect to remain in the First Class
Cities retirement system.
Several laws providing preferential federal income tax treatment of employee contributions, also
known as "pick-up" provisions, to members of the Washington retirement systems were not
amended to include PSERS.
Unlike Teachers Retirement System (TRS), PERS, and School Employees Retirement System
(SERS) members, a member of PSERS with prior service in Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire
Fighters Retirement System Plan 1 (LEOFF 1) is not permitted to irrevocably transfer LEOFF 1
service into PSERS.
A cross reference to the line of duty disability section in the PSERS definitions is incorrect.
When the 2006 Legislature changed the PSERS positional eligibility provisions from a specific
job-class eligibility based design to a criteria-based design, the definition of "eligible position" in
the PSERS definition section was not amended to remove "fully-compensated," leaving it
inconsistent with the new definition of "member."
Cross-References to PSERS and SERS
References to PSERS and SERS were not added to the list of eligible retirement systems whose
members may participate in a benefits contribution plan operated by the Health Care Authority,
such as a medical flexible spending account or a cafeteria plan.
The PSERS and SERS were not added to the list of retirement systems for which service is
excluded from consideration under the reserve officer provisions of the Volunteer Firefighters
and Reserve Officers' Relief and Pensions System.
Plan 3 Separated Vesting Requirements
The 2006 Legislature reduced the age-based vesting requirements for the defined benefit portions
of PERS, TRS, and SERS Plan 3 with five years of service from age 55 to age 44. The similar
Plan 3 vesting provisions in the gain-sharing chapter were not reduced from age 55.
Required Contribution Rate for TRS Plan 1 Judges
The 2006 Legislature permitted members of TRS Plan 1 who are Justices of the Washington
Supreme Court, Courts of Appeals Judges, and Superior Court Judges to elect to increase the rate
of contributions that they make into TRS Plan 1 by 6.26 percent of pay and increase their rate of
benefit accrual to 3.5 percent per year of service.
2000 Suspension of Employee and Employer Contributions to LEOFF 1
The 2000 Legislature suspended the requirement for employers and employees to make
contributions into the LEOFF 1 retirement fund unless the most recent actuarial valuation
indicates the plan has unfunded liabilities. The most recent actuarial valuation indicates that on
an actuarial basis LEOFF 1 is about 114 percent funded, with about $577 million more in assets
than liabilities.
Summary of Bill:
Cross-References to PSERS
The PSERS is added to the list of Washington retirement systems that are exempted from the
general "employee benefit plan" rules on exemption from legal process.
The PSERS is treated identically to PERS in cases of local government consolidation with a First
Class Cities Retirement System employer.
The PSERS is added to the pick-up and other federal tax-related provisions to permit preferential
tax treatment of employee contributions.
The PSERS is added to the systems into which LEOFF 1 service may be irrevocably transferred.
A cross reference to the line of duty disability section in the PSERS definitions is corrected.
"Fully compensated" is removed from the PSERS definition of "eligible position."
Cross-References to PSERS and SERS
The PSERS and SERS members may participate in benefits contribution plans, and service in
both plans is excluded from the definition of service in the Volunteer Firefighters and Reserve
Officers' Relief and Pensions System.
Plan 3 Separated Vesting Requirements
The vesting requirements for the gain-sharing portions of PERS, TRS, and SERS Plan 3 are
reduced from age 55 with five years of service to age 44 with five years of service. If Plan 3
gain-sharing is repealed during 2007, this section is null and void.
Required Contribution Rate for TRS Plan 1 Judges
The required additional TRS Plan 1 contribution rate for Justices and Judges to receive the 3.5
percent per year benefit accrual rate is reduced to 3.76 percent of pay.
Affirmation of the 2000 Suspension of LEOFF 1 Employee and Employer Contributions
The Legislature clarifies and affirms the 2000 suspension of the requirement that employees or
employers make contributions to LEOFF 1 if the plan remains fully funded. The affirmation is
curative, remedial, and retrospectively effective to June 30, 2000.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.