HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESB 5508
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
State Government & Tribal Affairs
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to economic development project permitting.
Brief Description: Providing for economic development project permitting.
Sponsors: Senators Kilmer, Zarelli, Hatfield, Schoesler, Holmquist, Kastama, Tom, Sheldon, Shin and Rasmussen.
Brief History:
State Government & Tribal Affairs: 3/23/07, 3/27/07 [DP];
Appropriations: 3/31/07, 4/2/07 [DPA].
Brief Summary of Engrossed Bill (As Amended by House Committee) |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT & TRIBAL AFFAIRS
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Hunt, Chair; Appleton, Vice Chair; Chandler, Ranking Minority Member; Armstrong, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Green, Kretz, McDermott, Miloscia and Ormsby.
Staff: Colleen Kerr (786-7168).
Background:
The Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA) was created by the Legislature in 2003 and
resides in the Office of Financial Management. The ORA serves as the nexus for the state
agencies that exercise the regulatory function of state government, including:
The ORA was created to provide citizens with information assistance regarding regulations,
permit requirements, and rule-making processes in the state. It is required to operate on the
principle that state citizens should receive a date and time for a decision on a permit, the
information required to make a decision on a permit, and an estimate of the maximum
amount of costs in fees, studies, or public processes that will be incurred by the applicant.
The Public Works Board provides low-interest loans, grants, and technical assistance to local
government entities to finance infrastructure projects to meet public health and safety needs.
Applicants can apply to several different loan programs throughout the year.
The Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) provides low-interest loans, grants,
and technical assistance to local government entities to finance and support infrastructure for
economic development projects. Applicant local government entities work with staff to
develop applications and may apply for assistance 45 days prior to any of the six annual
CERB meetings.
The Local Infrastructure Finance Tool (LIFT) is a competitive program that allows selected
local governments to take advantage of tax revenue generated by private investment in a
Revenue Development Area (RDA) to make payments on bonds used to finance public
infrastructure improvements. Incremental revenue increases in the RDA and revenue from
other local public sources are used to match state money and must also be used to repay the
same bonds. The state revenue earned is distributed through a local sales and use tax that is
credited against the state's sales and use tax. Local government entities may apply on an
annual basis.
The Job Development Fund (JDF), like the CERB, provides financing to support
infrastructure needs that meet economic development objectives, but it provides only grants
and can award up to $10 million per project to local government entity applicants. The JDF
had a two-phase annual application process.
Summary of Bill:
The Legislature recommends that permit applicants receive information from city, county, or
state agencies regarding the amount of time an agency will need to make a permit decision
and the minimum amount of information required for a decision. Applicants should also
receive information on when an application is considered complete, the expected agency fees,
and, in writing, the reasons for denial of a permit. Permitting agencies are encouraged to
report annually on success in providing this information.
When a local government applies for Public Works Board funding, Community Economic
Revitalization Board funding, Local Infrastructure Financing Tool funding, or Job
Development Fund Program funding, the criteria to be considered will include whether the
local government applicant has a good record of providing information to those applying for
development permits.
The ORA is to help local jurisdictions by providing information about best practices in
complying with permit timeline requirements and by providing technical assistance in
reducing the turnaround time between submittal and issuance of a development permit. The
termination date for the ORA is extended to June 30, 2011.
Appropriation: The sum of $45,000 is appropriated from the State General Fund to the Office or Regulatory Assistance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The biggest challenge for businesses in working with the state is the transparency
and predictability around the permitting process. This is the difference between new
investment in a community and no investment in a community. In recent years, the
Legislature has sought to improve this process by encouraging and requiring the development
of permitting timelines. Some Representatives have even proposed the idea of a permit
applicant's bill of rights. This bill differs from that idea in that this is a carrot to local
governments rather than a stick.
This bill is about improving government services and furthering the economic growth of the
state's communities. Predictability is crucial to builders who want to bid on projects and need
to budget both time and cost. Compliance among local jurisdiction with existing
requirements has been inconsistent at best. This bill provides an incentive rather than
punishment to these jurisdictions so that they will do what they are already supposed to do.
It is the right step to support small business. The regulatory system in the state and the
barriers it presents is as significant of a problem to small business as is healthcare. Small
businesses walk into the permit process with the expectation that government agencies will
present this information up front and in many cases this does not happen.
The annual reporting requirement allows the Legislature to be kept informed as to the
progress.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Senator Kilmer, prime sponsor; Carolyn Logue, National Federation of Independent Business; and Amy Brackenbury, Business Industry Association of Washington.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 29 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Buri, Chandler, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Hinkle, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kretz, Linville, McDermott, McDonald, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Schual-Berke, Seaquist, P. Sullivan and Walsh.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Anderson, Dunn and McIntire.
Staff: Alex MacBain (786-7288).
Background:
The Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA's) authorizing statute includes a sunset date of
June 30, 2007. The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) submitted its
sunset review on January 4, 2007. That review recommended extending the ORA's sunset
date to 2011 and recommended that ORA develop an implementation plan to remedy the
agency's lack of information about its activities. The JLARC also recommended that the
ORA should report to the Legislature to demonstrate performance and compliance with
statutory duties.
The ORA's authorizing statutes require it to report biennially to the Governor and the
Legislature with the following reports: a performance report based on customer surveys; a
report on any statutory or regulatory conflicts identified by the office in the course of its
duties; and a report on its use of outside independent consultants.
Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Appropriations Compared to
Recommendation of Committee On State Government & Tribal Affairs:
The Appropriations Committee recommended the elimination of the following biennial
reporting requirements of the ORA: a report on the agency's performance based on customer
surveys; a report on any statutory or regulatory conflicts identified by the office in the course
of its duties; and a report on its use of outside independent consultants. The Appropriations
Committee also recommended the elimination of the appropriation contained in the bill.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In Support) This legislation proposes to grant $45,000 to the Office of Regulatory Assistance
(ORA) so that they can assist local jurisdictions in complying with permit timeline reporting
requirements that were enacted in 2001 and 2003. Compliance with the timelines has been
intermittent at best. We hope that the assistance of ORA and the incentives provided in the
bill will encourage better compliance with the requirements by local jurisdictions.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Amy Brackenburg, Business Industry Association of Washington.