Washington State House of Representatives |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Transportation Committee | |
ESSB 6099
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Addressing the state route number 520 bridge replacement and HOV project.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Transportation (originally sponsored by Senator Murray).
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 3/26/07
Staff: Kathryn Leathers (786-7114).
Background:
The State Route 520 Evergreen Point Bridge (SR 520 bridge) is a one and a half mile, 42
year-old bridge that crosses Lake Washington in King County. The SR 520 bridge is in need of
replacement due to its vulnerability to seismic activity and storm events. In addition to the
deteriorating physical condition, the current bridge lacks shoulders for disabled and emergency
vehicles, and experiences considerable amounts of congestion on a daily basis.
In 1997, the Trans-Lake Washington Study Committee was authorized by the Legislature to
identify ways to improve transportation across and around Lake Washington. The Study
Committee evaluated over 100 concepts for the corridor, and recommended beginning the
development of a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) to further analyze those concepts,
including a four-lane and an eight-lane replacement facility.
Under state and federal law, a determination that a transportation project could have potential
adverse environmental impacts triggers the need to conduct an EIS under the National and State
Environmental Policy Acts. The EIS review is required to include a review of all reasonable
alternatives (not just the preferred alternative), and a plan for mitigating or avoiding impacts of
those alternatives.
For purposes of the EIS process, the project was led by the Department of Transportation
(Department), the Federal Highway Administration, and Sound Transit as co-lead agencies. Of
the 100 concepts identified by the Study Committee, 19 alternatives were selected for further
consideration. The first alternative EIS screening analysis for the SR 520 bridge replacement
project was completed in 2000. The second screening, which focused on the potential for high
capacity transit in the project corridor, was conducted in 2001. The second screening resulted in
reducing the concepts to seven multi-modal alternatives, each with highway and high capacity
transit components. A draft EIS that lays out the various design options for the two alternative
options a four-lane facility, and a six-lane facility consisting of four general purpose lanes and
two high capacity lanes was published in August 2006.
As the project has moved through the environmental review process, significant public outreach
has been conducted, through public meetings, community briefings, and other public events, and
through emails and letters. During the public comment period, the Department received over
1,700 unique submissions.
Summary of Bill:
The Department, after consultation with the City of Seattle, must hire a mediator as well as
urban, transportation, and neighborhood planners, to assist with developing an impact plan for
the State Route 520 bridge replacement project. In evaluating the impacts, the mediator must
consider the concerns of neighborhoods and institutions of higher education directly impacted by
the proposed designs. The plan must provide a comprehensive approach to mitigating the impacts
of the project, and will address impacts on Seattle neighborhoods, parks, the City of Seattle, and
institutions of higher education.
The Washington State Transportation Commission must oversee the development of the impact
plan, and must approve the plan 60 days before either the Regional Transportation Investment
District/Sound Transit measure is submitted to the voters in November 2007 or before the
beginning of the 2008 Legislative Session.
The Department must hire the mediator within existing appropriations for the State Route 520
bridge replacement project. The mediator position is not a certified mediator position with
legally binding decision authority.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect immediately.