HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESSB 6157
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
April 21, 2007
Title: An act relating to reducing offender recidivism by increasing access and coordination of offender services in communities through inventories of services and community transition coordination network pilot programs.
Brief Description: Changing provisions affecting offenders who are leaving confinement.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senator Prentice).
Brief History:
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 4/21/07, 64-33.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Staff: Sonja Hallum (786-7092).
Background:
Offender Reentry Issues
Each year, thousands of offenders return to the community from Washington prisons after
completing their sentences. Research from the Washington State Institute of Public Policy
(WSIPP) shows that approximately 54 percent of these offenders will commit a new felony
within 13 years. Further, the Washington Caseload Forecast Council estimates that under
existing policies, Washington's incarceration rate will increase 23 percent by the year 2019.
In 2005, the Legislature directed the WSIPP to report, by October 2006, whether
evidence-based and cost-beneficial policy options exist to alleviate the need to build more
prisons. The WSIPP concluded that several programs directed to adult offenders can have a
positive impact on recidivism and produce significant cost savings for the state of
Washington.
Earned Release
The Department of Corrections (DOC) may reduce an offender's term of confinement through
earned release time. Earned release time may be granted for good behavior and good
performance and can be taken away for disciplinary reasons.
An offender convicted of a serious violent offense or a class A felony sex offense, on or after
July 1, 2003, may obtain earned release time. Such an offender may not have his or her term
reduced by more than 10 percent via earned release time.
Certain other offenders can have their confinement reduced by up 50 percent. The DOC must
perform a risk assessment of eligible offenders and classify them into four risk groups. An
offender may have his or her term of confinement reduced by up to 50 percent via earned
early release time if he or she is among the lowest risk offenders and does not have criminal
history that would preclude the offender from being eligible for the earned release.
Education
In 1995, the Legislature adopted a law requiring the DOC to prioritize its available resources
to meet the following educational goals, specified in order of priority:
(1) achievement of basic academic skills through obtaining a high school diploma or its
equivalent, and achievement of vocational skills necessary for purposes of work
programs and for an inmate to qualify for work upon release;
(2) additional work and education programs that are compatible with an offender's case
management plan; and
(3) other work and education programs as appropriate.
The 1995 legislation required the DOC to develop a formula by which inmates would
contribute to the cost of certain educational and vocational programs based on their ability to
pay. The formula requires offenders to pay a portion of the costs or tuition for any second or
subsequent vocational program associated with their work programs and any Associate of
Arts or Baccalaureate degree programs that are part of their case management plans. The
formula also requires offenders to pay all costs and tuition of any post-secondary academic
program and any second or subsequent vocational program that is not part of their case
management plan.
Community Custody
"Community custody" means that portion of an offender's sentence of confinement served in
the community subject to controls placed on the offender's movement and activities by the
DOC.
If the offender violates the conditions of community custody, the offender may be required to
serve up to the remaining portion of the sentence, less credit for any period actually spent in
community custody or in detention awaiting disposition on the alleged violation. If a sex
offender violates any condition of community custody the DOC may impose a sanction of up
to 60 days confinement in a local correctional facility for each violation. If the offender has
served his maximum term of confinement, the DOC may impose sanctions available in the
community.
An offender accused of violating a condition of community custody is entitled to a hearing
before the department before sanctions are imposed. The hearing is considered a disciplinary
hearing and is not subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.
Summary:
PART I - Community Transition Coordination Networks
Each county or group of counties is required to conduct an evaluation of the services
available in the county or region to assist offenders in reentering the community and, by
December 1, 2008, present its assessment to the policy advisory committee convened by the
Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (DCTED).
A Community Transition Coordination Network program (CTCN) is created within the
DCTED. The CTCN program is a pilot project established for the purpose of awarding
grants to counties or groups of counties for implementing coordinated reentry efforts for
offenders returning to the community.
A county, or group of counties, may apply for grant funds to utilize evidence-based or
promising practices to support successful, community-based offender reentry. Among other
components, the county or group of counties wishing to implement a network must
collaborate with the DOC, address methods to identify offenders' needs, and connect the
offender with needed resources and services that support reentry into the community.
Counties receiving grant funds must work with the WSIPP to establish data tracking
mechanisms and conduct an evaluation at the completion of the pilot program. The grant
program extends for a period of four fiscal years, beginning July 1, 2008, and ending June 20,
2012.
No county is required to establish a CTCN program and there is not an entitlement for a
county or group of counties to receive funding to create a CTCN program.
The duties of local Law and Justice Councils are revised to include consideration of
mechanisms for sharing information regarding offenders and developing partnerships
between the DOC and community policing and supervision programs to facilitate supervision
of offenders.
The following requirements for the DOC are removed:
PART II - Individual Reentry Plan
Intent language in the bill states that Individual Reentry Plans (IRP) are intended to be a tool
for the DOC to identify the needs of an offender and to assist the DOC in targeting programs
to offenders with the greatest need, to the extent funding is available. The IRP is not,
however, a guarantee that the offender will not recidivate.
The DOC is required to develop an IRP for virtually all inmates in DOC custody. The IRP
establishes a plan for the offender during the period of incarceration through release into the
community and addresses programming for the offender while incarcerated and a plan for the
offender to follow upon release to facilitate successful reintegration into the community.
The initial IRP is created within 60 days of the initial assessment of the offender. The plan is
updated during the period the offender is incarcerated and prior to discharge.
An offender released to community supervision, community custody, or community
placement, must be returned to his or her county of origin, unless return to his or her county
of origin would be inappropriate considering victim safety, negative influences on the
offender in the community, or the location of family or other supports.
PART III - Partial Confinement and Supervision
Residential Work Release Centers
The WSIPP is required to conduct an analysis of residential reentry and work release
programs to identify evidence-based practices for Washington. The institute should identify
optimal services or combination of services to be provided to offenders reentering the
community through work release programs.
The DOC is required to convene a work group to review current laws and policy regarding
work release and make recommendations to the Governor and Legislature for changes to
transform work release facilities into residential reentry centers. The DOC must report the
results and recommendations from the work group to the Governor and the Legislature by
November 15, 2008.
Community Justice Centers
The DOC must continue to establish Community Justice Centers (CJC) throughout the state
with a minimum of six facilities to be established by December 1, 2009, and three additional
facilities to be established by December 1, 2011. The CJCs are nonresidential facilities and
must include a violator program to utilize sanctions for violations of supervision, an
employment opportunity program, and resources for connecting offenders with services. The
DOC must also designate a transition coordinator to facilitate connections between the
former offender and the community.
Beginning July 1, 2007, the DOC must prepare a list of counties in which work release
facilities and CJCs are anticipated to be located within the next three years and transmit the
list to the Office of Financial Management and the counties on the list. In preparing the list
of counties, the DOC must make substantial efforts to provide for the equitable distribution
of the facilities. Equitable distribution means siting of the facilities in a manner that
reasonably reflects the proportion of offenders sentenced to the custody or supervision of the
DOC and, to the extent practicable, the proportion of offenders residing in the particular
areas.
Earned Release
In order to qualify for 50 percent earned release an offender must participate in programming,
so long as the programming is available to the offender, and must not have committed a new
felony after the effective date of the act while under supervision.
If the DOC denies transfer to community custody in lieu of earned early release, the DOC
may transfer the offender to partial confinement for up to three months in lieu of earned early
release.
The offender may spend no more than the final six months of the offender's term of
confinement in partial confinement, in addition to any time exchanged for partial
confinement.
Violations
If an offender has not completed his or her maximum term of total confinement, and is
subject to a third violation hearing for a violation of any condition of community custody,
the DOC must return the offender to total confinement in a state correctional facility to serve
up to the remaining portion of his or her sentence if the offender is found to have committed
the violation. However, the offender will not be required to serve up to the entire remainder
of the sentence if it is determined that returning the offender to a state correctional facility
would substantially interfere with the offender's ability to maintain necessary community
supports or to participate in necessary treatment or programming and would substantially
increase the offender's likelihood of reoffending.
An offender who is arrested while on community custody, community supervision, or
community placement, for a new felony offense must be held in total confinement until a
DOC hearing on the violation or until being formally charged for the offense.
Review of Policy
A task force is created to review laws related to community custody and community
supervision. The task force is comprised of 15 members, including legislative and
non-legislative members. The task force is required to review statutes related to community
custody and community supervision of offenders, make recommendations related to
sentencing to assist Community Corrections Officers in more easily identifying statutory
requirements related to an offender's sentence and community custody and supervision, make
recommendations regarding the violation hearing process, and make recommendations
regarding simplifying statutory language. The task force is required to report to the
Legislature by November 1, 2007.
The DOC is required to conduct an updated community corrections workload study and
report the results of the that study to the Governor and Legislature on or before November 1,
2007.
PART IV - Education
The DOC is to fund basic academic skills including obtaining a high school diploma or its
equivalent; achievement of vocational skills necessary for purposes of work programs and for
an inmate to qualify for work upon release; and additional work and education programs
necessary for compliance with an offender's individual reentry plan (except post-secondary
education). However, an offender must pay the costs of education or vocational training if
the offender previously withdrew from a program without excuse as defined by the DOC.
Other vocational work or education programming that is not necessary for compliance with
the IRP must be paid by the inmate according to a sliding scale formula.
A third party may pay all or a portion of the costs and tuition for any programming.
Payments for this purpose must not be subject to any of the deductions usually taken from
payments to the offender that are applied toward the legal financial obligations of the
offender.
The DOC must implement postsecondary education degree programs within state correctional
institutions to the extent funding is provided. An inmate must pay for the costs of a
postsecondary education degree program by paying for the program themselves, receiving
funding from a third party, or by obtaining a loan from the DOC. The DOC must establish a
process for awarding loans to the extent that funds are appropriated for that purpose. The
inmate must repay the loan beginning two years after release. The DOC is to determine the
amount of interest to be accrued on loan at the time of collection. Money collected is
reinvested in the loan program.
The DOC and the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges must investigate and
review methods to optimize educational and vocational programming opportunities for
offenders. The DOC and the State Board must report to the Governor and the Legislature no
later than July 1, 2008.
The WSIPP must conduct a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of evidence-based
correctional education programs and the extent to which Washington's programs are in
accord with these practices. The WSIPP must report to the Governor and the Legislature no
later than November 15, 2007.
The following requirements are removed:
PART V - Employment Barriers
The DOC and the Department of Licensing must enter into an agreement to expedite
procedures to assist offenders in obtaining a drivers license or identification card upon release
from a DOC institution. The Department of Licensing is also required to convene a work
group to review and recommend changes to occupational licensing laws and policies to
encourage the employment of individuals with criminal convictions while ensuring the safety
of the public.
PART VI - Housing
A landlord who rents to an offender is not liable for civil damages arising from the criminal
conduct of the tenant if the landlord discloses to residents that he or she has a policy of
renting to offenders and takes steps to report or halt criminal activity if the landlord has
actual knowledge of criminal activity on the landlord's premises.
The DCTED is required to establish an offender reentry transitional housing assistance pilot
program to provide grants to eligible organizations to provide transitional housing to
offenders who are reentering the community and are in need of housing. The pilot program
will be located in a minimum of two locations and will be operated in collaboration with the
CJC existing in the location of the pilot site. The transitional housing must be supportive
housing.
The DOC is required to cooperate with the DCTED in determining an appropriate formula
for the distribution of funds and developing rules, requirements and procedures for operation
of the program, including eligibility. Priority for housing is to be given to offenders who are
designated as high risk or high needs, or those without a viable release plan. The DOC is
required to cooperate with organizations receiving grant funds to identify appropriate housing
solutions, facilitate an offender's application for housing prior to discharge, and assist the
offender in accessing appropriate services. Prior to placing an offender into housing, the
DOC must analyze the risk the offender may pose to that particular community or other
residents.
The state, DOC, DCTED, local government, local housing authorities, eligible organizations,
and their employees are not liable for civil damages arising from the criminal conduct of an
offender solely due to the placement of an offender in housing provided under the pilot
program.
An offender may obtain the release of funds from his or her inmate savings account prior to
discharge for the purpose of securing appropriate housing.
Appropriation: $300,000 of State General Fund is appropriated for FY 2008 and $300,000 of State General Fund is appropriated for FY 2009 to the DOC for the purpose of implementing sections 305(2) and (4) of the act; $900,000 of State General Fund is appropriated for FY 2008 and $900,000 of State General Fund is appropriated for FY 2009 for the purposes of implementing sections 304 (1)(b)(ii)(D) and (E) of the act; and $100,000 of State General Fund is appropriated for FY 2008 and $100,000 of State General Fund is appropriated for FY 2009 for the purpose of implementing section 307 of this act.
Fiscal Note: Available for E2SSB 5070.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
None.
Persons Testifying: None.