HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESSB 6333
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House - Amended:
March 7, 2008
Title: An act relating to the creation of a citizens' work group on health care reform.
Brief Description: Establishing a citizens' work group on health care.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Health & Long-Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Keiser, Kohl-Welles, Marr and McAuliffe).
Brief History:
Health Care & Wellness: 2/25/08, 2/27/08 [DPA];
Appropriations: 3/1/08, 3/3/08 [DPA(APP w/o HCW)].
Floor Activity:
Passed House - Amended: 3/7/08, 63-31.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH CARE & WELLNESS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Cody, Chair; Morrell, Vice Chair; Barlow, Campbell, Green, Moeller, Pedersen, Schual-Berke and Seaquist.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Hinkle, Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Condotta and DeBolt.
Staff: Dave Knutson (786-7146).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended by Committee on Appropriations and without amendment by Committee on Health Care & Wellness. Signed by 22 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Green, Haigh, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Linville, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Schual-Berke, Seaquist and Sullivan.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 12 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Chandler, Hinkle, Kretz, McDonald, Priest, Ross, Schmick and Walsh.
Staff: Wendy Polzin (786-7137).
Background:
Over the past 20 years, Washington has enacted several policy and budget initiatives to
extend health coverage to individuals and families who did not have access to affordable
health insurance. The creation of the Basic Health Plan, the expansion of eligibility for the
Medicaid program, the creation of the "Cover All Children" program, and the Health
Insurance Partnership all combine to extend publically subsidized health coverage to
previously uninsured groups. There is still a sizeable population of individuals in
Washington who are not covered by health insurance and do not have access to affordable
health coverage. There is not a consensus about how best to provide access to affordable,
quality health coverage to all Washingtonians. Options to provide increased access to
affordable health coverage range from private sector modifications of insurance regulation to
public sector expansions of existing publically subsidized programs.
Summary of Amended Bill:
A 13-member work group including nine citizens appointed by the Governor and four
legislators will engage in a public process of considering health reform proposals. The work
group will report their findings, conclusions, and recommendations to the Governor and the
Legislature by December 1, 2009. The Legislature will contract for an independent analysis
of four health reform proposals ranging from a market based health coverage plan to a single
payer proposal that will provide universal coverage.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Health Care & Wellness)
(In support) There needs to be an active engagement with citizens from all walks of life about
what to do with our health care system. Health care is too expensive, it is not accessible, and
the quality is not high enough. An econometric analysis of several different health care
reform proposals will lay the ground work for a new health care system in Washington.
(Opposed) It does not make sense to engage in a public process exploring health care reform
before an econometric analysis of various proposals is completed. Engaging in a series of
focus groups and grass roots meetings during an election cycle will turn this into a partisan,
political process.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Appropriations)
(In support) The citizen representation and the analysis contained in the bill will provide
grounding for public meetings and allow for an informed discussion. Information like this is
sometimes lacking in other health care discussions. Substantive health care discussions
between citizens and legislators are very important. Supporters endorse the idea that
universal health care is an achievable objective. Health care costs are high and there are
different ways to organize the health care system to improve them. The Blue Ribbon
Commission Health Care Costs and Access (BRC) did not have much in the way of citizen
involvement as this does. This bill acts on a recommendation of the BRC, which is to take
steps ensuring universal health care is available. Supporters would like the citizen
involvement portions of the bill to begin earlier.
(Opposed) The bill contains a lot of bureaucracy, and the Senate and House committees could
do everything in the bill on their own. It will be difficult to improve on the BRC. Language
in the bill is unclear about who is hiring the full-time equivalents (FTE's) for the work group.
The bill contains no market-based proposals and nothing on personalized health. Two of the
proposals have cost estimates from the Office of Financial Management and will cost in the
billions of dollars. There have been many reports already, and in this biennium the money
for this bill could be better spent on other things. The presidential election is approaching
and with it there will likely be a new approach to health care options, so it would be better to
wait or move forward with the BRC's recommendations. Authorizing this work group would
be a step backward.
Persons Testifying: (Health Care & Wellness) (In support) Senator Keiser, prime sponsor;
Mike Kreidler, Office of the Insurance Commissioner; David McLanahan, Physicians for a
National Health Program - Western Washington; Kent Davis and Linda Davis, Washington
Health Security Coalition; Damiana Merryweather, United Food and Commercial Workers -
State Council; Teresa Mosqueda, Children's Alliance; Len McComb, Washington Hospital
Association; and Brian Wicks, Washington State Medical Association.
(Opposed) Troy Nichols, National Federation of Independent Business - Washington; Mark
Johnson, Washington Retail Association; and Gary Smith, Independent Business Association.
Persons Testifying: (Appropriations) (In support) Robby Stern, Washington State Labor
Council; Len Eddinger, Washington State Medical Association; Bill Daley, Washington
Community Action Network; and Lonnie Johns-Brown, League of Women Voters.
(Opposed) Lew McMurran, Washington Technology Industry Association; and Troy Nichols,
National Federation of Independent Business/Washington.