Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness Committee | |
SB 6525
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
Brief Description: Concerning the drug offender sentencing alternative.
Sponsors: Senators Kline, McCaslin, Tom, Weinstein and Swecker; by request of Department of Corrections.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/20/08
Staff: Yvonne Walker (786-7841).
Background:
The Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA) is an alternative sentencing program that
allows a court to waive imposition of an offender's sentence within the standard sentencing
range. There are two types of DOSA programs: prison-based DOSA and residential-based
DOSA. Courts have the option to sentence a nonviolent offender with a substance abuse
addiction to either of the DOSA programs.
An offender is eligible for the prison-based DOSA program if:
If the court determines that a DOSA sentence is appropriate for an offender then it may impose
an alternative sentence that includes confinement in a state facility for one-half of the mid-point
of the standard sentencing range. While in confinement, the offender must complete a substance
abuse assessment and receive, within available resources, substance abuse treatment and
counseling.
The offender must spend the remainder of the mid-point of the standard sentencing range in
community custody following incarceration. The community custody portion of the sentence
must include alcohol and substance abuse treatment which has been approved by the Division of
Alcohol and Substance Abuse of the Department of Social and Health Services. Offenders may
also be required to adhere to crime related prohibitions and affirmative conditions as part of their
sentence, as well as pay a $30 per month fee while on community custody to offset the cost of
monitoring.
The courts have been inconsistent in how much community custody is ordered following an
offender's period of incarceration. For example, in the case where the mid-point of the standard
sentencing range is 12 months, an offender would be required to spend 12 months in
confinement (the statute requires one-half of the mid-point of the standard range in confinement
or 12 months, which is greater). Following incarceration, an offender is required to spend the
"remainder of the mid-point" of the standard sentencing range on community custody. Some
courts are interpreting this to mean six months on community custody and other courts are
interpreting this as no community custody because "the remainder" of one-half of the mid-point
of the standard sentencing range (six months) was used to raise the offender's confinement time
up to the 12 months.
Summary of Bill:
The provision governing the imposition of community custody for offenders on a prison-based
DOSA is amended and clarified. Following an offender's period of confinement, he or she must
spend one-half of the mid-point (instead of the "remainder" of the mid-point) of the standard
sentencing range on community custody following incarceration.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.