HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSJM 8012


This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a statement of legislative intent.

As Passed House:
April 9, 2007

Brief Description: Requesting the Washington Air and Army National Guard not be federalized.

Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Government Operations & Elections (originally sponsored by Senators Brown, Hewitt, Franklin, Fraser, Oemig, Kline, Kilmer, Swecker, Hobbs, Hatfield, Marr, Spanel, Regala, Kohl-Welles, Berkey, Pridemore, Rasmussen, McAuliffe, Sheldon and Shin).

Brief History:

State Government & Tribal Affairs: 3/28/07, 3/30/07 [DP].

Floor Activity:

Passed House: 4/9/07, 82-16.

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill
  • Requests Congress to pass pending legislation related to presidential control of the National Guard.


HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT & TRIBAL AFFAIRS

Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Hunt, Chair; Appleton, Vice Chair; Green, Kretz, McDermott, Miloscia and Ormsby.

Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 2 members: Representatives Chandler, Ranking Minority Member and Armstrong, Assistant Ranking Minority Member.

Staff: Alison Hellberg (786-7152).

Background:

The federal John Warner National Defense Authorization Act of 2007 (P.L. 109-364) gives the President of the United States power to federalize the National Guard without consent of the governors. Previously, governors had control of the National Guard in domestic emergencies and the President had control for overseas demands.

The President may employ the National Guard in federal service to:

There are currently two companion bills pending before Congress that revive previous authority on the use of armed forces and the National Guard.


Summary of Bill:

Legislative findings are made that:

The United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate are requested to enact H.R. 869 and S. 513, which relate to presidential control of the Guard.


Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The bill that passed out of the Senate is identical to the House companion bill that the committee has already heard. The changes made to the Senate version were made to the House version prior to its introduction. The Governor, the National Governors Association, and the National Conference of State Legislatures are all in favor of this.

(Opposed) The encroachment of federal power on the states is a problem, especially with the current administration. Currently, however, there is a conspiracy in the State of Washington. It is necessary for the President to take control of the Guard to stop the project in the Port of Olympia that is violating the Environmental Policy Act.

Persons Testifying: (In support) Brigadier General Gordon Toney, Washington Military Department.

(Opposed) Arthur West.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.